# matrix-bridge — AGENTS.md A single-user Matrix bot that turns a message in a project room into a live Claude Code session in that project's repo on the Mac — surfaced to the phone via Claude Code Remote Control. It makes the *trigger* portable: from anywhere on the WireGuard network, a Matrix message starts a session on the Mac in the correct repo, and Remote Control pushes it to the phone to drive interactively. Single user, private home network, no multi-user/product scope. > **Inbox check:** At session start, if `~/Projects/standards/INBOX.md` exists, scan it for > items tagged `(matrix-bridge)` and surface them before proposing next steps; triage with > `/triage`. ## Core flow (v1) ``` Matrix message in a project room → bot (matrix-nio, on the DGX Spark) receives it → looks up which repo that room maps to (explicit config — no classification) → SSHes to the Mac and runs scripts/launch-claude.sh with (repo_dir, message_text) → wrapper cd's into the repo and launches `claude` with the message as the prompt → Claude Code Remote Control (auto-enabled) pushes a notification to the phone → tap in and drive the session from the Claude app ``` Room determines the repo; the message text becomes the initial prompt. That is the entire v1 decision surface. ## Stack - **Bot:** Python, **matrix-nio** (from the nio-template scaffold), single Docker container. - **Runs on:** a DGX Spark (always-on Linux, Docker). *Not* Start9, *not* the Mac. - **Mac seam:** `scripts/launch-claude.sh`, a zsh login-shell wrapper that owns all environment setup and launches `claude`. - **Config:** a readable room→repo mapping file (TOML) — adding a project is a config edit. - **State:** none beyond config in v1; SQLite or flat files only if a later phase needs them. ## Placement | Question | Decision | Rationale | |---|---|---| | Sensitivity / sovereignty | Local-only when an LLM is ever involved | v1 makes no LLM call; future intent-parsing must run on a local model via Spark Control — message content may reference investor/portfolio context. Never wire a frontier API to message payloads. | | Runtime shape | Long-running service (always-listening bot) | Must be up unattended to catch messages. | | Host | DGX Spark, Docker container | Always-on Linux with Docker; co-located with Qwen3 for future local intent-parsing; reaches both Synapse (network) and the Mac (SSH). | | s9pk vs container | Plain container | Not on Start9 at all — StartOS only runs s9pk packages; don't pay packaging cost, don't touch Synapse. | | Model routing | None in v1; future Qwen3 via Spark Control | Keeps the sovereignty boundary; deterministic core first. | | Data layer | Config file (TOML) | v1 needs no datastore. | | Interface | Matrix (Element) + phone via Remote Control | "Reachable from phone" already satisfied by WireGuard + Remote Control. | | Repo home | Local + Gitea backup | `ssh://git@immense-voyage.local:59916/grant/matrix-bridge.git`. | ## Commands - `scripts/launch-claude.sh ` — the Mac wrapper (Phase 0 deliverable; validate by hand before any bot code). - _TODO (Phase 1+):_ bot build/run (`docker build` / `docker compose up` on the Spark) once `src/` exists. ## Layout - `AGENTS.md` — this file (canonical; `CLAUDE.md` is a relative symlink to it). - `ROADMAP.md` — Phases 1–4+ with falsifiable exits, plus deferred/future directions. - `README.md` — human-facing intro. - `scripts/launch-claude.sh` — the Mac-side launch wrapper (the only seam that knows the Mac's environment). - `config.example.toml` — room→repo mapping template; the real `config.toml` is gitignored. - `.claude/` — Claude wiring (dir only for now). - _Future:_ `src/` (the matrix-nio bot), `Dockerfile`, dependency manifest — Phase 1. ## Decisions (already made — don't relitigate without new information) Condensed from the scoping workshop. Each: the call, why, what it beat. - **D1 — matrix-nio, not Maubot.** Full control for one custom bot with real SSH-orchestration logic; keeps Spark Control as the single dashboard. *Beat:* Maubot (competing web UI, management layer we don't need), SimpleMatrixBotLib. - **D2 — Bot runs on the Spark, not Start9 or the Mac.** Always-on Linux + Docker, co-located with Qwen3, reaches Synapse + the Mac. *Beat:* Start9 (no s9pk), Mac (not always-on; it's the execution target, not the orchestrator). - **D3 — Synapse stays untouched.** Treat the existing StartOS Synapse as a fixed external homeserver; the bot logs in as an ordinary Matrix user over WireGuard/LAN. - **D4 — The Mac wrapper is the environment seam.** A `#!/bin/zsh -l` wrapper owns PATH/credentials/`cd`/`exec claude`; the bot stays dumb and only invokes it over SSH. *Beat:* inlining `source ~/.zprofile && …` from the bot (brittle); relying on the default non-interactive SSH shell (the core failure mode — minimal shell loads neither `.zprofile` nor `.zshrc`). - **D5 — Remote Control is the phone-control layer.** Native, E2EE, already auto-enabled; execution stays on the Mac. The bot only needs to *start* the session. *Note:* outside server mode, one remote session per Claude Code instance. - **D6 — Room = repo; routing is deterministic in v1.** No classification, no LLM, no path branching. *Beat (for v1):* LLM intent parsing → deferred to D8. - **D7 — No Nextcloud / CalDAV in v1.** Not the pain point; the interesting future (routing Claude/bot *outputs* into Nextcloud) is real but unscoped. - **D8 — Intent parsing deferred, but as a "routing brain."** When added (Phase 4+): a smart dispatcher that, knowing all repos/contexts, decides which repo applies and what context to inject — not a task-vs-session classifier. MUST run on a local model via Spark Control. *Revisit when:* the deterministic core (Phases 1–2) is proven. - **D9 — E2EE deferred (documented tradeoff).** Single-user bot over WireGuard on a private LAN; transport is already private and matrix-nio E2EE adds libolm overhead. *Revisit when:* the bot ever handles sensitive content over untrusted transport. - **D10 — Spark Control manages the bot (Phase 3).** Status on the dashboard + one-click update/restart, the same SSH-behind-buttons pattern Spark Control uses for the Sparks today. ## Sovereignty constraint v1 sends nothing to external services except what is deliberately typed into the Claude Code session itself. The bot's own logic is fully local. **When intent parsing is added later it MUST run on a local model via Spark Control — never a frontier API** — because it reads message content that may reference investor/LP/portfolio context. Never wire an external API call that carries message payloads. ## Implementation guardrails (from the workshop) - **Quoting through SSH is the known footgun.** Message text crosses two shells (the Spark's, then the Mac's). Use `shlex.quote` (or equivalent) when building the remote command — never naive string-concatenate user text into the SSH command. - **Fail loud on a bad directory.** If a room maps to a missing dir, the wrapper exits non-zero (`cd "$1" || exit 1`) and the bot reports the failure back into the room — never launches Claude in the wrong place. - **Config over code** for the room→repo mapping. ## Definition of done per phase Substance threshold **N = 3** real uses, defined per phase in `ROADMAP.md`. "Done" means falsifiable, scaled substance (it worked 3 real times), never a checkbox. A phase that "works once" is not done. ## Current state - **Scaffolded 2026-06-15** from a prior scoping package (SPEC/DECISIONS/CLAUDE/KICKOFF), folded into this AGENTS.md (decisions + placement), `ROADMAP.md` (phases), and the wrapper + config skeleton. No bot code yet — by design. - **Next: Phase 0 (manual chain validation, N=3)** — Matrix onboarding (Element, Space, first room, a bot user), write + locally test `scripts/launch-claude.sh`, passwordless SSH from the Spark to the Mac, prove the full chain (message → SSH → wrapper → Claude session → phone notification I can drive) by hand at least 3 times, and record the first room→repo mapping. Bot code starts only after Phase 0 is proven. The original KICKOFF prompt is the step-by-step for Phase 0.