Phase 1: investor↔contacts (member_of), system status, thesis seed v1

- entity_resolution: emit member_of relationship edges (contact -> investor),
  so one investor entity owns many contacts (institution) and a HNWI is the N=1
  case; crm_tools.get_investor_contacts + get_entity contacts/member_of; MCP tool.
- seed_synthetic: multi-contact institutions to exercise it (Harbor & Vine = 5).
- server.py: GET /api/system/status (index/entity/thesis/activity health) for an
  in-app status view (no shell needed to verify the index).
- docs/thesis-seed-v1.md: grounded v1 thesis (throughline, 6 pillars, objections,
  per-segment angles, voice) drawn from Ten31's newsletter/site/essays.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/thesis-seed-v1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Ten31 Thesis — Seed v1 (a starting point to sharpen)
+
+*Drafted from Ten31's own material: the newsletter, ten31.xyz/home and /insights (esp. "Digital Industrialization: Land, Labor & Capital," "Credible Finance," "Coherence in an Age of Abundance"), the current self-description, and the partner's workshop notes. This is **v0 to react to**, not a finished thesis — it's the raw clay the Architect helps you and your partner sharpen (vary framings, red-team LP objections, ground each claim in your essays/track record). Where the partner's framing was "too philosophical," I've paired each abstract move with the concrete investment logic underneath it.*
+
+---
+
+## Throughline (the spine)
+
+> **Every wave of digital industrialization makes one resource abundant and forces value into whatever stays scarce.** The internet made *distribution* free and pooled value in attention. AI is making *competence* free and pooling value into its scarce physical inputs — energy and compute. Bitcoin makes *capital itself* verifiable, and the last scarce resource becomes **credibility**. The pattern doesn't change: when a resource turns abundant, value abandons it for whatever stays scarce. **Ten31 invests in the scarce side of each shift — bitcoin, energy, and the credible infrastructure of the AI era — and backs the bitcoin-native founders organizing capital and production around it, while the position is still mispriced.**
+
+*(One-line version for cold contexts: "The world's leading investor at the convergence of bitcoin, energy, and AI — backing the scarce side of every digital shift, and the founders building it.")*
+
+## Pillars
+
+**1. The scarcity shift is the master pattern — and it's accelerating.**
+Each digital epoch decentralizes one domain and concentrates value in another (your *Digital Industrialization* essay). Internet → distribution. AI → competence. Bitcoin → capital access. Value flees the newly-abundant for whatever stays scarce. *Investment logic: we position on the scarce side of the current shift — energy, compute, and verifiable capital — before the market reprices it.*
+
+**2. Bitcoin is the base layer of a credible economy.**
+"Proof over promise." As AI floods the world with cheap, unverifiable output, verifiable scarcity and credibility become the premium — and bitcoin is the only money that delivers both (*Credible Finance*; *The Global Capital Circuit*). *Investment logic: bitcoin infrastructure — custody, payments, lending, computing, security — is the rails of that economy, and we've backed it since 2013.*
+
+**3. The bitcoin–energy–AI convergence is physical, not theoretical.**
+Mining monetizes stranded energy; compute and bitcoin compete for the same low-cost megawatts; sovereign infrastructure and secure inference become moats as competence commoditizes (*Coherence in an Age of Abundance*). *Investment logic: energy and compute are the scarce inputs of the AI era; bitcoin prices, secures, and settles them. We invest across that physical stack (e.g. Giga Energy, Upstream Data) — "the world's largest investor focused on the convergence of bitcoin, energy, and AI."*
+
+**4. We back a specific kind of founder.**
+Bitcoin-native operators: long time horizons, real ownership, no patience for fragility or shortcuts — people who saw the future before the market thought it possible. We don't screen for bitcoin; the best founders in this space already think this way. *Proof: Strike (global bitcoin financial services) and Start9 (personal datacenters for edge AI) share nothing as businesses — but the same kind of founder is at the top.*
+
+**5. The portfolio is a synergistic ecosystem, not a list of bets.**
+Sequoia-inspired: complementary companies whose value compounds in combination — custody enables payments, payments drive commerce, commerce produces sovereignty (*An Investment Platform for Bitcoin Adoption*). *Proof: 35+ portfolio companies, $200M+ deployed across two funds, unmatched founder access and credibility from a decade in the ecosystem.*
+
+**6. Patient, credible capital — and the position is still mispriced.**
+Long time preference, durability over paper markups, "gradually, then suddenly." *Investment logic: Fund III takes the convergence position while the market still underprices it.*
+
+## Key objections to pressure-test (red-team targets)
+
+- *"Isn't this just a bitcoin fund?"* → No: it's a thesis on the scarce inputs of the AI/energy era, with bitcoin as the credibility/settlement layer — a broader and more durable position than "buy bitcoin."
+- *"Energy + AI infrastructure is crowded and capital-intensive."* → Our edge is founder access and the bitcoin-native lens that generalist energy/AI capital lacks; we back the operators, not the hype cycle.
+- *"Concentration / correlation risk to bitcoin's price."* → The ecosystem spans infrastructure with real revenue (energy, compute, financial services), not directional bitcoin beta; durability over markups.
+- *"Why now?"* → The convergence just turned physical (AI's energy/compute crunch) while bitcoin's role as credible capital is still underpriced — the gap is the opportunity.
+
+## Segment angles (per-segment lines, sharing the spine)
+
+*Per the decision that different audiences may carry different—but related—narratives:*
+- **Bitcoin-native HNWI** — conviction, sovereignty, asymmetric upside; "you already see it; we invest in it." (Lean into *Because We're Right*.)
+- **Institution** — risk-adjusted, credible exposure to the AI-energy buildout via a differentiated manager with a decade-long edge; secular tailwinds, durability.
+- **Family office (bitcoin/AI-curious, other focuses)** — a generational allocation to the convergence; patient capital aligned with multi-generational horizons; ecosystem diversification.
+- **Smaller accredited ($100k checks)** — accessible entry to the same thesis the HNWIs back; aligned conviction, lower minimum.
+- **AI-oriented investors** — the scarce-inputs (energy/compute) + secure-inference angle; bitcoin as AI's settlement and credibility layer.
+- **Energy players** — stranded/curtailed energy monetization; bitcoin + compute as flexible offtake; the physical buildout.
+
+## Voice (to encode in the `ten31-voice` skill)
+
+Sophisticated, macro-literate, conviction-driven, and willing to be irreverent (per the newsletter). Proof over promise; historical analogies (railroads, "gradually then suddenly"); confident but not hype-y; never crypto-casino framing (no NFTs/meme-coin energy). "This is us": James J. Hill, scarcity, credibility, sovereignty, long time preference. "Not us": growth-at-all-costs, paper markups, shiny speculation.
+
+---
+
+## How to use this
+
+This becomes the seeded **core thesis line** in the Architect. From here the loop is: you and your partner react → the Architect proposes sharper variations, drafts the per-segment cuts, anticipates LP objections, and grounds each claim against your essays + real LP conversations → you both leave feedback and sign off. Nothing here is canonical until you approve it.
+
+**Open spots needing your input:** which pillars are load-bearing vs. cuttable; the exact Fund III framing/numbers to use externally; confirming the segment set; and any sacred phrases / forbidden framings for the voice guide.