Replace v5 settlement spine with v2.0 reserve-asset spine (v0.1.0:73)

Swap the dead "scarcity as the connecting idea" / bitcoin-as-settlement
spine for the v2.0 reserve-asset spine (bitcoin = apex non-debasable
reserve asset; debasement = forcing function; AI = abundance engine;
throughline is an asset-value/capital-flow claim, not settlement; three
seams Energy<->Compute, Debasement<->Bitcoin, AI<->Data-Ownership)
everywhere it was still encoded in live code, the seed, and the docs.

- architect_agent.py / outreach_agent.py: both system prompts carried
  "scarcity as the connecting idea" and shipped settlement framing into
  every generated draft; rewritten to the reserve-asset spine.
- thesis_seed.py: THROUGHLINE, PILLAR_1, the AI/energy-operator segment
  angle, and THESIS_V2 corrected and voice-cleaned (no em dash / "X, not
  Y" / "bet"). PILLAR_2/3 (real revenue, founder access) kept.
- ensure_thesis_v2_promoted / revert_thesis_v2_promotion: make the v2.0
  spine the working APPROVED spine and re-ground/clean the core nodes,
  deployment-state-invariant (structural targeting, not body text) and
  fully reversible (captures prior body/title/status/deleted_at). NODE
  level only: never sets a thesis_version canonical (guardrail #4); no
  hard deletes (guardrail #3). Wired into init_db after the v2 candidate
  stage.
- docs/thesis-handoff.md replaced wholesale with the complete v2.0 doc;
  Ten31_Agentic_Build_Plan.md + PHASE_1.md throughline glosses updated.

The v2.0 spine remains an unratified draft from the signal-engine
workstream: canonical freeze stays the partners' dual sign-off, and
Appendix-A conviction/exposure figures stay Grant's working read.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/PHASE_1.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Grant: *"we are gravitating towards what we think the key message is, but we hav
 ## What the partners must supply (the content the substrate can't invent)
 
 The Architect *sharpens an existing thesis; it does not author one from nothing.* These are inputs, co-authored in the first Architect sessions:
-- [ ] **Thesis seed (v1):** the current-best throughline (scarcity / critical-infrastructure tying bitcoin ↔ AI infrastructure / energy / freedom tech) broken into **3–5 pillars** and a first set of testable **claims**.
+- [ ] **Thesis seed (v2.0 reserve-asset spine):** the current-best throughline (as fiat debases and AI commoditizes the reproducible, value accrues to the scarce side of one supply chain and the monetary premium accrues to bitcoin as the non-debasable reserve asset — an asset-value/capital-flow claim, not settlement/payments) structured on **three seams** (Energy↔Compute, Debasement↔Bitcoin, AI↔Data-Ownership) and a first set of testable **claims**.
 - [ ] **LP segments** (build-plan open decision #4): confirm/define the distinct audiences (proposed starter set: family office, institution, bitcoin-native HNWI, energy player) and, per segment, *what they need to hear* and *what to avoid saying*.
 - [ ] **Voice:** tone/diction, "this is us / this is not us" before-after examples, sacred phrases, words we never use.
 - [ ] **Approval policy:** who may promote a thesis version to canonical (any admin? Grant specifically? dual partner sign-off?).