The email-capture "proposed grid notes" gain two review surfaces:
1. Inline source email — each proposed-note card on the Email Capture page
gets a "View email" toggle that lazily fetches the existing
GET /api/email/detail and shows from/to/cc/date/subject + scrollable body,
so a reviewer can judge the note against the email it was drafted from.
2. CRM->Matrix review bridge — the CRM (box, stdlib, no matrix-nio) can't post
to Matrix, so the intake bot (Spark) PULLS: GET /api/intake/email-proposals
returns to_post/open/to_close work-lists; the bot posts a review card
(metadata + snippet + draft note) to a dedicated review room
(MATRIX_EMAIL_REVIEW_ROOM) and relays in-thread yes / no / NL-edit
(POST .../{id}/decide, note revised via local Qwen). Decisions sync both
ways: web decide -> bot announces + closes the thread; Matrix decide -> the
web panel's ~25s poll clears the card. State lives CRM-side in the new
email_proposal_matrix side row (email-integration migration 0003, additive
+ idempotent CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS), so it survives a bot restart.
Adds a 'bot' role (authenticated, never admin; require_bot_or_admin) to gate
the email-proposal endpoints rather than handing the bot full admin — the
principled base for the coming agentic capabilities. Role controls reach;
the draft->approve gate still controls autonomy (a human approves every write).
Deploy split: endpoints + migration + role + frontend ship in the s9pk; the
bot poll loop + review-room handling ship on the Spark. The bot's CRM user
must be flipped member->bot and joined to the review room (one-time).
Tests: backend/test_email_proposal_matrix.py + matrix_intake/test_email_proposals.py
(30/30 suite green, render-smoke green, migration verified twice on a DB copy).
Local-smoke found "jonathan is chatting with wyoming" extracted the teammate, not
the prospect. Feed the parser an optional team roster (INTAKE_TEAM_ROSTER) via a
build_system(roster) outreach frame: roster names/initials are the people doing
outreach and are never extracted; the other party is the investor/prospect. Same
framing on the revise leg. Unset roster = prior behavior.
New backend/matrix_intake/ runs as its own process (matrix-nio isolated from the
stdlib CRM): local-Qwen parse via Spark Control → in-thread human approval
(yes/edit/no) → write through the CRM's own log-communication endpoint, tagged
source=matrix_intake. Adds read-only GET /api/intake/match (returns grid row id,
no-duplicate contract); threads provenance through handle_log_fundraising_communication.
Reviewer-passed: pop-before-commit closes a double-approve race; edit-grammar fix.
Text-only v1; business-card photo (M3) deferred (no Spark vision model).
26/26 tests green; live Matrix smoke pending deploy.
Sends a once-a-day internal email to all active admins summarizing each team
member's email activity per investor, plus a team-wide by-investor view
(inbound + outbound, deduped). Narratives are generated on the LOCAL Spark
model, never Claude — the digest is intentionally un-anonymized, so substance
stays on Ten31 infra. This is an internal ops email, exempt from the
'agents draft, humans send' rule (which governs outward LP contact).
- backend/digest_builder.py: per-user + per-investor activity queries
(soft-delete filtered), per-user Spark narrative with a deterministic
fallback, two-section plain-text body, and the DB-backed policy resolver.
- backend/email_integration/digest_scheduler.py: always-on daily thread that
re-reads the policy each cycle and sends once/day; window cursor in
app_settings so a missed day rolls forward.
- server.py: POST /api/admin/digest/send-now and GET/PATCH
/api/admin/digest/policy; scheduler wired into main().
- Control lives in Settings -> Admin (enable toggle + send-time dropdown),
not StartOS actions; env vars only seed the first-boot default.
- Tests: backend/test_digest_builder.py.
The box's existing service-account domain-wide-delegation grant already includes
gmail.compose, which authorizes users.messages.send — verified 2026-06-15 by a
token-mint probe and a live messages.send to grant. So CRM-originated mail can
send through the account that already powers email capture: no SMTP account, no
app password, no admin change.
- backend/email_integration/gmail_send.py: send_via_gmail() impersonates a
domain user and POSTs users.messages.send (reuses credentials.py + the compose
scope; mirrors compose.py's REST pattern).
- backend/digest_mailer.py: send_digest() prefers Gmail DWD when enabled, falls
back to smtp_send otherwise. Sender = CRM_DIGEST_SENDER else first active admin.
- server.py: the admin test endpoint now routes through digest_mailer (so the
Settings button sends via DWD on the box with zero SMTP config). Recipient
restriction to the admin set and no-leak error handling preserved.
- test_gmail_send.py: build/send + transport routing (provider + urlopen faked).
19/19 backend green; s9pk typechecks.
SMTP (v75) stays as the fallback transport. Send-path decision + scope finding
recorded in ROADMAP.md and AGENTS.md.
Groundwork for the daily activity digest: give the CRM an outbound mail path.
Today nothing leaves the box (Gmail capture + drafts only), so this adds a
dedicated, per-package SMTP account independent of any StartOS system-wide SMTP.
- configureDigestSmtp Start9 action: writes host/port/from/username/password/
security to /data/secrets/smtp/* (password piped over stdin, never argv/env;
per-field files, owner-only) — mirrors the setAnthropicApiKey pattern.
- docker_entrypoint.sh reads those at boot and exports SMTP_* (operator env wins).
- backend/smtp_send.py: stdlib smtplib wrapper reading SMTP_* (one code path for
dev .env and the box); starttls/tls/none modes.
- POST /api/admin/digest/test-email (admin-only): proves the pipe. Recipients are
restricted to the active-admin set — an arbitrary `to` is rejected, so the
endpoint is not an open relay; send failures are logged, not echoed (an SMTP
auth error can carry the credential).
- Tests: test_smtp_send.py (sender), test_smtp_endpoint.py (gating + relay
restriction + no-leak). 18/18 backend green; s9pk typechecks.
Analysis/summarization for the digest body (Phase B) will run on Spark, never
Claude — the digest is deliberately un-anonymized. Decisions + Phase B plan in
ROADMAP.md.
Keysat