Read-only natural-language query over the curated nl_query endpoint, answered
in-thread. Two entry points (room-per-purpose model): a dedicated Q&A room
(MATRIX_QUERY_ROOM) where every top-level message is a question, plus the
?/@bot trigger in the intake room as a cross-room convenience. Both routes hit
the same handle_query -> crm_client.nl_query -> POST /api/query/nl; translation
runs on the box's local model, nothing leaves the box, and there is no write
path so no approval gate applies.
Pure logic (trigger parsing, answer rendering) in query.py with offline tests;
async room wiring in bot.py (live-smoke only, per the bot's convention).
Bot-side only, ships on the Spark via git pull + restart. Depends on the
box-side /api/query/nl endpoint, which lands with the v93 s9pk (reminders + W2):
until v93 is installed the Q&A surface 404s, so the bot deploy is staged to
follow that install.
The email-capture "proposed grid notes" gain two review surfaces:
1. Inline source email — each proposed-note card on the Email Capture page
gets a "View email" toggle that lazily fetches the existing
GET /api/email/detail and shows from/to/cc/date/subject + scrollable body,
so a reviewer can judge the note against the email it was drafted from.
2. CRM->Matrix review bridge — the CRM (box, stdlib, no matrix-nio) can't post
to Matrix, so the intake bot (Spark) PULLS: GET /api/intake/email-proposals
returns to_post/open/to_close work-lists; the bot posts a review card
(metadata + snippet + draft note) to a dedicated review room
(MATRIX_EMAIL_REVIEW_ROOM) and relays in-thread yes / no / NL-edit
(POST .../{id}/decide, note revised via local Qwen). Decisions sync both
ways: web decide -> bot announces + closes the thread; Matrix decide -> the
web panel's ~25s poll clears the card. State lives CRM-side in the new
email_proposal_matrix side row (email-integration migration 0003, additive
+ idempotent CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS), so it survives a bot restart.
Adds a 'bot' role (authenticated, never admin; require_bot_or_admin) to gate
the email-proposal endpoints rather than handing the bot full admin — the
principled base for the coming agentic capabilities. Role controls reach;
the draft->approve gate still controls autonomy (a human approves every write).
Deploy split: endpoints + migration + role + frontend ship in the s9pk; the
bot poll loop + review-room handling ship on the Spark. The bot's CRM user
must be flipped member->bot and joined to the review room (one-time).
Tests: backend/test_email_proposal_matrix.py + matrix_intake/test_email_proposals.py
(30/30 suite green, render-smoke green, migration verified twice on a DB copy).
Local-smoke found "jonathan is chatting with wyoming" extracted the teammate, not
the prospect. Feed the parser an optional team roster (INTAKE_TEAM_ROSTER) via a
build_system(roster) outreach frame: roster names/initials are the people doing
outreach and are never extracted; the other party is the investor/prospect. Same
framing on the revise leg. Unset roster = prior behavior.
New backend/matrix_intake/ runs as its own process (matrix-nio isolated from the
stdlib CRM): local-Qwen parse via Spark Control → in-thread human approval
(yes/edit/no) → write through the CRM's own log-communication endpoint, tagged
source=matrix_intake. Adds read-only GET /api/intake/match (returns grid row id,
no-duplicate contract); threads provenance through handle_log_fundraising_communication.
Reviewer-passed: pop-before-commit closes a double-approve race; edit-grammar fix.
Text-only v1; business-card photo (M3) deferred (no Spark vision model).
26/26 tests green; live Matrix smoke pending deploy.
Keysat