0508690d5a
Scoped API keys (P1): migrate 58 admin endpoints from require_admin to
require_scope so ks_ keys with Read-only/License-issuer/Support/Full-admin roles
work as intended. 12 sensitive endpoints stay master-key-only (issuer key,
provider connect/disconnect, web password, api-key CRUD, db-info, operator-name,
per-license tier change). require_scope is re-exported from api::admin so both
auth gates import from one place. Adds role-boundary tests.
Settle-amount tripwire (P1): get_invoice_status now returns
ProviderInvoiceSnapshot { status, amount }. On a confirmed settle,
audit_settle_amount (shared by the webhook and reconcile issue paths) compares
the provider-reported sat amount against the invoice's amount_sats and, on drift,
logs a warning + writes an invoice.amount_mismatch audit row, then issues anyway.
Advisory by design: a hard gate would fight an operator's BTCPay payment
tolerance, and Settled already implies paid-in-full. SAT-only — skips non-SAT
settles (fiat subscription renewals) and unparseable amounts.
3688 lines
123 KiB
Rust
3688 lines
123 KiB
Rust
//! API endpoint integration tests.
|
||
//!
|
||
//! Drives real HTTP requests through the daemon's `axum::Router` against
|
||
//! a real SQLite database (per-test tempfile, identical pool options to
|
||
//! `src/db/mod.rs::init`). Companion to `tests/migrations.rs`: that file
|
||
//! tested schema correctness; this one tests endpoint correctness.
|
||
//!
|
||
//! These tests bypass `main.rs`'s env-var bootstrap and skip background
|
||
//! workers (reconcile, webhook delivery, session reaper). They construct
|
||
//! `AppState` programmatically with deterministic values so the same
|
||
//! pool, signing key, and admin token are reachable from inside the test
|
||
//! body.
|
||
|
||
use anyhow::Result;
|
||
use axum::body::{to_bytes, Body};
|
||
use axum::http::{HeaderMap, Request, StatusCode};
|
||
use axum::response::Response;
|
||
use chrono::Utc;
|
||
use keysat::api::{self, AppState};
|
||
use keysat::config::Config;
|
||
use keysat::crypto::{self, LicensePayload};
|
||
use keysat::db::repo;
|
||
use keysat::license_self::Tier;
|
||
use keysat::payment::{
|
||
CreateInvoiceParams, CreatedInvoiceHandle, Money, PaymentProvider, ProviderInvoiceSnapshot,
|
||
ProviderInvoiceStatus, ProviderKind, ProviderWebhookEvent,
|
||
};
|
||
use serde_json::{json, Value};
|
||
use sqlx::sqlite::{
|
||
SqliteConnectOptions, SqliteJournalMode, SqlitePool, SqlitePoolOptions, SqliteSynchronous,
|
||
};
|
||
use std::any::Any;
|
||
use std::path::PathBuf;
|
||
use std::str::FromStr;
|
||
use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicU64, Ordering};
|
||
use std::sync::Arc;
|
||
use std::time::Duration;
|
||
use tempfile::NamedTempFile;
|
||
use tokio::sync::RwLock;
|
||
use tower::ServiceExt;
|
||
use uuid::Uuid;
|
||
|
||
/// Deterministic admin token used by every test that exercises an admin
|
||
/// endpoint. ≥32 chars to satisfy `Config::from_env`'s validation rule
|
||
/// (we don't go through that path here, but matching the constraint
|
||
/// keeps fixtures realistic).
|
||
const TEST_ADMIN_KEY: &str = "test_admin_api_key_with_at_least_32_chars_present";
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// Fixtures
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// Open a fresh pool against a throwaway tempfile, mirroring
|
||
/// `src/db/mod.rs::init` exactly. `NamedTempFile` is returned so the
|
||
/// caller keeps it alive for the test's lifetime — when it drops, the
|
||
/// OS reclaims the file.
|
||
async fn make_pool() -> (SqlitePool, NamedTempFile) {
|
||
let tmp = NamedTempFile::new().expect("create tempfile");
|
||
let url = format!("sqlite://{}", tmp.path().display());
|
||
let opts = SqliteConnectOptions::from_str(&url)
|
||
.expect("parse sqlite url")
|
||
.create_if_missing(true)
|
||
.journal_mode(SqliteJournalMode::Wal)
|
||
.synchronous(SqliteSynchronous::Normal)
|
||
.foreign_keys(true)
|
||
.busy_timeout(Duration::from_secs(5));
|
||
let pool = SqlitePoolOptions::new()
|
||
.max_connections(2)
|
||
.connect_with(opts)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("connect to sqlite");
|
||
sqlx::migrate!("./migrations")
|
||
.run(&pool)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("run migrations");
|
||
(pool, tmp)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Build a fully-populated `AppState` ready to serve requests. Skips
|
||
/// `main.rs`'s env-var bootstrap and never spawns background workers —
|
||
/// these tests only exercise the request/response handler chain.
|
||
///
|
||
/// - `payment` is `None`. Endpoints that require a payment provider
|
||
/// (e.g. `POST /v1/purchase`) will return 503; tests below don't drive
|
||
/// those paths.
|
||
/// - `self_tier = Tier::Unlicensed` inherits Creator-tier caps (5
|
||
/// products, 5 codes, etc.). Plenty for the small fixtures here.
|
||
async fn make_test_state() -> (AppState, NamedTempFile) {
|
||
let (pool, tmp) = make_pool().await;
|
||
let keypair = crypto::keys::load_or_generate(&pool)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("load_or_generate keypair");
|
||
|
||
let cfg = Config {
|
||
bind: "127.0.0.1:0".parse().unwrap(),
|
||
db_path: PathBuf::from(":memory:"),
|
||
admin_api_key: TEST_ADMIN_KEY.to_string(),
|
||
btcpay_url: "http://btcpay.test:23000".to_string(),
|
||
btcpay_browser_url: None,
|
||
btcpay_public_url: None,
|
||
btcpay_api_key: None,
|
||
btcpay_store_id: None,
|
||
btcpay_webhook_secret: None,
|
||
public_base_url: "http://keysat.test".to_string(),
|
||
operator_name: Some("Test Operator".into()),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let state = AppState {
|
||
db: pool,
|
||
keypair: Arc::new(keypair),
|
||
payment: Arc::new(RwLock::new(None)),
|
||
provider_override: None,
|
||
config: Arc::new(cfg),
|
||
self_tier: Arc::new(RwLock::new(Tier::Unlicensed {
|
||
reason: "test fixture".into(),
|
||
})),
|
||
rates: keysat::rates::RateCache::new(),
|
||
};
|
||
(state, tmp)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Issue one request through the router. Clones state per call (cheap;
|
||
/// the DB pool, Arc'd config and keypair are all `Clone`) so multiple
|
||
/// requests in a single test share the same backend.
|
||
async fn send(state: &AppState, req: Request<Body>) -> Response {
|
||
api::router(state.clone())
|
||
.oneshot(req)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("router::oneshot")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
async fn body_json(resp: Response) -> Value {
|
||
let bytes = to_bytes(resp.into_body(), 1024 * 1024)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("read body");
|
||
serde_json::from_slice(&bytes).expect("response body should be JSON")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn build_request(
|
||
method: &str,
|
||
uri: &str,
|
||
headers: &[(&str, &str)],
|
||
body: Option<Value>,
|
||
) -> Request<Body> {
|
||
let mut b = Request::builder().method(method).uri(uri);
|
||
for (k, v) in headers {
|
||
b = b.header(*k, *v);
|
||
}
|
||
let body = match body {
|
||
Some(v) => {
|
||
b = b.header("content-type", "application/json");
|
||
Body::from(serde_json::to_vec(&v).expect("serialize JSON body"))
|
||
}
|
||
None => Body::empty(),
|
||
};
|
||
b.body(body).expect("build request")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// Tests
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// Smoke test for the framework. If this passes, we know the
|
||
/// state-construction + router-dispatch + response-parsing pipeline
|
||
/// works; tests below can focus on real assertions.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn health_endpoint_returns_200() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let req = build_request("GET", "/healthz", &[], None);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Admin endpoints reject calls that lack a valid admin token. The
|
||
/// distinction between 401 (no/malformed header) and 403 (header present
|
||
/// but token doesn't match) matters — the SPA renders different UI for
|
||
/// each ("you're not logged in" vs "you don't have permission").
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_endpoint_rejects_missing_or_wrong_auth() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let body = json!({"slug": "x", "name": "X", "price_sats": 100});
|
||
|
||
// No Authorization header → 401 unauthorized.
|
||
let req = build_request("POST", "/v1/admin/products", &[], Some(body.clone()));
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::UNAUTHORIZED,
|
||
"missing auth header should be 401"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Wrong token → 403 forbidden. (The constant-time compare in
|
||
// require_admin returns Forbidden, not Unauthorized, when a token
|
||
// is present but doesn't match.)
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[(
|
||
"authorization",
|
||
"Bearer wrong_token_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
|
||
)],
|
||
Some(body),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::FORBIDDEN,
|
||
"wrong token should be 403"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// The full happy path for an admin write: auth → handler → DB insert
|
||
/// → audit log → response. If a refactor ever breaks one of those
|
||
/// links, this fails loudly.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_creates_product_with_correct_token() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "test-product",
|
||
"name": "Test Product",
|
||
"description": "for tests",
|
||
"price_sats": 10_000
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"expected 200; got {}",
|
||
resp.status()
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["slug"], "test-product");
|
||
assert_eq!(body["name"], "Test Product");
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_sats"], 10_000);
|
||
let id = body["id"]
|
||
.as_str()
|
||
.expect("response body should contain product id")
|
||
.to_string();
|
||
|
||
// Row landed in DB.
|
||
let count: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM products WHERE id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(count, 1, "exactly one product row should exist");
|
||
|
||
// Audit row was written for the create.
|
||
let audit_count: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action = 'product.create' AND target_id = ?",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(audit_count, 1, "audit log should record one create");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// `/v1/validate` always returns HTTP 200 (per the documented contract);
|
||
/// failures are surfaced via `ok: false` + a machine-readable `reason`.
|
||
/// Bogus input returns `bad_format` — the parser couldn't even decode
|
||
/// the base32 envelope. This exercises the rate-limit pre-check and
|
||
/// the early parse-fail path.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn validate_rejects_unsigned_garbage() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/validate",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({"key": "not-a-real-license"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["ok"], false);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["reason"], "bad_format");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// End-to-end license validation:
|
||
/// - seed a product
|
||
/// - issue a license tied to it
|
||
/// - sign a matching `LicensePayload` with the daemon's actual key
|
||
/// - encode to the base32 wire format
|
||
/// - POST /v1/validate
|
||
/// - assert `ok: true` plus the populated metadata fields
|
||
///
|
||
/// This is the most complex of the first round — it ties together DB
|
||
/// writes, the crypto module, and the validate handler. If anything in
|
||
/// any of those layers regresses, this fails.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn validate_accepts_well_formed_license() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
|
||
// Seed a product directly via the repo (skip the admin endpoint —
|
||
// this test is about /v1/validate, not product creation).
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"validate-test",
|
||
"Validate Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
100,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
// Issue a license tied to that product. Perpetual, single-machine,
|
||
// no entitlements — the simplest valid license shape.
|
||
let license_id = Uuid::new_v4();
|
||
let issued_at = Utc::now();
|
||
repo::create_license(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&license_id.to_string(),
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
None, // invoice_id (manual issuance — no invoice)
|
||
&issued_at.to_rfc3339(),
|
||
&json!({}), // metadata
|
||
None, // policy_id
|
||
None, // expires_at — perpetual
|
||
0, // grace_seconds
|
||
1, // max_machines
|
||
&[], // entitlements
|
||
false, // is_trial
|
||
None, // buyer_email
|
||
None, // nostr_npub
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_license");
|
||
|
||
// Build the matching signed payload. Must use the same product_id
|
||
// and license_id as the DB row, because validate() looks the row up
|
||
// by license_id and verifies product_id matches.
|
||
let product_uuid = Uuid::parse_str(&product.id).expect("product id is a uuid");
|
||
let payload = LicensePayload {
|
||
version: 2,
|
||
flags: 0,
|
||
product_id: product_uuid,
|
||
license_id,
|
||
issued_at: issued_at.timestamp(),
|
||
expires_at: 0,
|
||
fingerprint_hash: [0; 32],
|
||
entitlements: vec![],
|
||
};
|
||
let signature = crypto::sign_payload(&state.keypair.signing, &payload);
|
||
let key_string = crypto::encode_key(&payload, &signature);
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/validate",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({"key": key_string})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
body["ok"], true,
|
||
"validation rejected a known-good license: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["license_id"], license_id.to_string());
|
||
assert_eq!(body["product_id"], product.id);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["status"], "active");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// MockPaymentProvider — exercises the purchase + webhook code paths
|
||
// without talking to a real BTCPay. Reports kind=Btcpay so the daemon's
|
||
// BTCPay-specific compat accessors keep working; produces deterministic
|
||
// invoice ids so tests can assert on them; bypasses HMAC verification
|
||
// in `validate_webhook` and instead parses the test-supplied JSON body.
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// How the mock answers the handler's settle-confirmation re-fetch
|
||
/// (`get_invoice_status`).
|
||
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
|
||
enum StatusReport {
|
||
/// Report this authoritative status.
|
||
Reports(ProviderInvoiceStatus),
|
||
/// Simulate the provider's status API being unreachable (network error).
|
||
Unavailable,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
struct MockPaymentProvider {
|
||
next_invoice_id: AtomicU64,
|
||
status_report: StatusReport,
|
||
/// Amount `get_invoice_status` reports the invoice is denominated for.
|
||
/// `None` (the default) = "no opinion", which disables the advisory
|
||
/// settle-amount tripwire; `Some` lets a test drive an amount mismatch.
|
||
settled_amount: Option<Money>,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
impl MockPaymentProvider {
|
||
/// Happy path: the provider confirms the invoice is settled.
|
||
fn new() -> Self {
|
||
Self {
|
||
next_invoice_id: AtomicU64::new(1),
|
||
status_report: StatusReport::Reports(ProviderInvoiceStatus::Settled),
|
||
settled_amount: None,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Authoritative status does NOT confirm payment, so a `settled` webhook
|
||
/// body is a forgery the handler must refuse.
|
||
fn new_unconfirmed() -> Self {
|
||
Self {
|
||
next_invoice_id: AtomicU64::new(1),
|
||
status_report: StatusReport::Reports(ProviderInvoiceStatus::Pending),
|
||
settled_amount: None,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// The provider's status API is unreachable, so the handler can't confirm
|
||
/// a settle and must ack-without-issuing (deferring to the reconciler).
|
||
fn new_status_unavailable() -> Self {
|
||
Self {
|
||
next_invoice_id: AtomicU64::new(1),
|
||
status_report: StatusReport::Unavailable,
|
||
settled_amount: None,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Confirms `Settled` but reports a specific denominated amount, so a test
|
||
/// can exercise the advisory settle-amount tripwire (mismatch → still
|
||
/// issues, but audits).
|
||
fn new_settled_with_amount(amount: Money) -> Self {
|
||
Self {
|
||
next_invoice_id: AtomicU64::new(1),
|
||
status_report: StatusReport::Reports(ProviderInvoiceStatus::Settled),
|
||
settled_amount: Some(amount),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[async_trait::async_trait]
|
||
impl PaymentProvider for MockPaymentProvider {
|
||
fn kind(&self) -> ProviderKind {
|
||
ProviderKind::Btcpay
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
async fn create_invoice(
|
||
&self,
|
||
_params: CreateInvoiceParams<'_>,
|
||
) -> Result<CreatedInvoiceHandle> {
|
||
let n = self.next_invoice_id.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst);
|
||
Ok(CreatedInvoiceHandle {
|
||
provider_invoice_id: format!("mock-inv-{n}"),
|
||
checkout_url: format!("http://mock-checkout.test/i/{n}"),
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
async fn get_invoice_status(
|
||
&self,
|
||
_provider_invoice_id: &str,
|
||
) -> Result<ProviderInvoiceSnapshot> {
|
||
// The webhook handler re-fetches this to confirm a settle claim
|
||
// before issuing. Configurable per-mock so a test can simulate the
|
||
// provider disagreeing with a forged "settled" body, or being down.
|
||
match self.status_report {
|
||
StatusReport::Reports(s) => Ok(ProviderInvoiceSnapshot {
|
||
status: s,
|
||
amount: self.settled_amount.clone(),
|
||
}),
|
||
StatusReport::Unavailable => {
|
||
anyhow::bail!("mock: provider status API unavailable")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Test-friendly webhook validator. Production providers would
|
||
/// HMAC-verify the body; we instead parse the body as JSON of
|
||
/// shape `{"kind": "settled"|"expired"|"invalid"|"refunded"|<other>,
|
||
/// "provider_invoice_id": "..."}`. Tests construct their own
|
||
/// payloads with no signature ceremony.
|
||
fn validate_webhook(
|
||
&self,
|
||
_headers: &HeaderMap,
|
||
body: &[u8],
|
||
) -> Result<ProviderWebhookEvent> {
|
||
let v: Value = serde_json::from_slice(body)?;
|
||
let kind = v["kind"].as_str().unwrap_or("");
|
||
let id = v["provider_invoice_id"].as_str().unwrap_or("").to_string();
|
||
Ok(match kind {
|
||
"settled" => ProviderWebhookEvent::InvoiceSettled {
|
||
provider_invoice_id: id,
|
||
},
|
||
"expired" => ProviderWebhookEvent::InvoiceExpired {
|
||
provider_invoice_id: id,
|
||
},
|
||
"invalid" => ProviderWebhookEvent::InvoiceInvalid {
|
||
provider_invoice_id: id,
|
||
},
|
||
other => ProviderWebhookEvent::Other {
|
||
kind: other.to_string(),
|
||
provider_invoice_id: Some(id).filter(|s| !s.is_empty()),
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn as_any(&self) -> &dyn Any {
|
||
self
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Build a state with a MockPaymentProvider already installed. Mirror of
|
||
/// `make_test_state` for tests that drive the purchase / webhook paths.
|
||
async fn make_test_state_with_mock_provider() -> (AppState, NamedTempFile) {
|
||
install_mock_provider(MockPaymentProvider::new()).await
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Install a specific `MockPaymentProvider` on a fresh test state, wiring it
|
||
/// into both the legacy singleton and the merchant-profile resolver (see the
|
||
/// two-seams note below). Lets tests vary the mock's behavior — e.g. an
|
||
/// unconfirmed-status mock to exercise the settle-confirmation guard.
|
||
async fn install_mock_provider(mock_impl: MockPaymentProvider) -> (AppState, NamedTempFile) {
|
||
let (mut state, tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let mock: Arc<dyn PaymentProvider> = Arc::new(mock_impl);
|
||
// Two seams, two code paths:
|
||
// - The legacy singleton (`set_payment_provider`) backs the back-compat
|
||
// `/v1/{kind}/webhook` route via `state.payment_provider()`.
|
||
// - The `provider_override` field backs the merchant-profile resolver
|
||
// (`resolve_provider_for_profile_rail` / `payment_provider_by_id`) that
|
||
// the real `/v1/purchase` path uses. Both point at the same mock so a
|
||
// test can drive purchase → settle end-to-end.
|
||
state.set_payment_provider(mock.clone()).await;
|
||
state.provider_override = Some(mock);
|
||
// The resolver still reads profile/rail/row from the DB before swapping in
|
||
// the override, so a real provider row must exist on the default profile —
|
||
// otherwise the purchase path 400s with "no payment providers connected".
|
||
// build_provider is never called for it (the override short-circuits), so
|
||
// the BTCPay credentials here are inert placeholders.
|
||
let default_profile = repo::get_default_merchant_profile(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("query default profile")
|
||
.expect("migration 0020 auto-creates a default merchant profile");
|
||
repo::create_payment_provider(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"test-provider-1",
|
||
&default_profile.id,
|
||
"btcpay",
|
||
"Test BTCPay",
|
||
"inert-test-key",
|
||
"http://btcpay.test",
|
||
None,
|
||
Some("deadbeef"),
|
||
Some("store-test"),
|
||
&Utc::now().to_rfc3339(),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("seed test payment provider");
|
||
(state, tmp)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// Purchase + webhook tests
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// The free-tier shortcut: when post-discount, post-policy-override
|
||
/// price is 0 sats, the daemon synthesizes a settled invoice locally,
|
||
/// issues a license inline, and returns the signed key in the response.
|
||
/// No payment provider involved — `payment` stays `None`. This test
|
||
/// verifies that fast path end-to-end.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn free_purchase_issues_license_inline() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let now = Utc::now().to_rfc3339();
|
||
|
||
// Seed a product (price > 0) plus a "free" policy that overrides
|
||
// the price to 0 sats. This is the common shape: paid product with
|
||
// an optional free tier on the buy page.
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"free-test",
|
||
"Free Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
10_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
sqlx::query(
|
||
"INSERT INTO policies(id, product_id, name, slug, price_sats_override, \
|
||
max_machines, public, created_at, updated_at) \
|
||
VALUES('pol-free', ?, 'Free', 'free', 0, 1, 1, ?, ?)",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&product.id)
|
||
.bind(&now)
|
||
.bind(&now)
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("insert free policy");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/purchase",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"product": "free-test",
|
||
"policy_slug": "free"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
body["amount_sats"], 0,
|
||
"free policy should produce zero-sat invoice"
|
||
);
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["license_key"].is_string(),
|
||
"free purchase should return license inline: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["checkout_url"], "");
|
||
|
||
// License row exists in DB.
|
||
let licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(licenses, 1, "exactly one license should be issued");
|
||
|
||
// The inline license_key validates round-trip via /v1/validate.
|
||
let key = body["license_key"].as_str().unwrap().to_string();
|
||
let req = build_request("POST", "/v1/validate", &[], Some(json!({"key": key})));
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let validation = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
validation["ok"], true,
|
||
"the inlined license_key must validate cleanly: {validation:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Paid purchase end-to-end through the trait. v0.1.0:43 migrated
|
||
/// `purchase::start` off the legacy `state.btcpay_client()` compat
|
||
/// accessor onto the abstract `state.payment_provider()` trait
|
||
/// surface, which means a `MockPaymentProvider` can drive the path
|
||
/// without a real BTCPay roundtrip.
|
||
///
|
||
/// Verifies:
|
||
/// - the daemon delegates invoice creation to the provider
|
||
/// - the returned `provider_invoice_id` is stamped onto the local
|
||
/// invoice row's `btcpay_invoice_id` column
|
||
/// - the buyer-facing `checkout_url` is whatever the provider
|
||
/// returned (mock returns a deterministic stub URL; production
|
||
/// BtcpayProvider rewrites the host inside its impl)
|
||
/// - no license is issued at this stage (that's the webhook's job)
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn paid_purchase_creates_invoice_via_provider() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state_with_mock_provider().await;
|
||
|
||
repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"paid-test",
|
||
"Paid Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
10_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/purchase",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({"product": "paid-test"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
let status = resp.status();
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
status,
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"paid purchase should succeed against the mock provider; body={body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(body["amount_sats"], 10_000);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["btcpay_invoice_id"], "mock-inv-1");
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["checkout_url"]
|
||
.as_str()
|
||
.map_or(false, |s| s.starts_with("http://mock-checkout.test/")),
|
||
"checkout_url should pass through from the provider: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["license_key"].is_null(),
|
||
"no license should be issued before the settle webhook fires"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Pending invoice row exists with the provider's id stamped on it.
|
||
let invoice_status: String = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT status FROM invoices WHERE btcpay_invoice_id = 'mock-inv-1'",
|
||
)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(invoice_status, "pending");
|
||
|
||
// No license yet.
|
||
let licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(licenses, 0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Anti-forgery (P0): a `settled` webhook whose provider API does NOT
|
||
/// confirm payment must not settle the invoice or issue a license. This is
|
||
/// the defense for signature-less providers (Zaprite) — a forged settle
|
||
/// POST with a known order id would otherwise mint a free license. The
|
||
/// handler re-fetches `get_invoice_status`; the unconfirmed mock reports
|
||
/// `Pending`, so the claim is refused: 200 ack (so the provider stops
|
||
/// retrying) but no state change and no license.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn forged_settle_webhook_without_provider_confirmation_is_refused() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) =
|
||
install_mock_provider(MockPaymentProvider::new_unconfirmed()).await;
|
||
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"forgery-test",
|
||
"Forgery Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
7_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let internal_invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
let provider_invoice_id = "mock-inv-forged".to_string();
|
||
repo::create_invoice(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&internal_invoice_id,
|
||
&provider_invoice_id,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
7_000,
|
||
"http://mock-checkout.test/i/forged",
|
||
None, // buyer_email
|
||
None, // buyer_note
|
||
None, // policy_id
|
||
None, // payment_provider_id
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_invoice");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({ "kind": "settled", "provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id })),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"handler should ack the forged webhook so the provider stops retrying"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let status_after: String =
|
||
sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT status FROM invoices WHERE btcpay_invoice_id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&provider_invoice_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
status_after, "pending",
|
||
"forged settle must NOT flip the invoice to settled"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(licenses, 0, "forged settle must NOT issue a license");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// When the provider's status API is unreachable, a settle webhook must be
|
||
/// acked (200, so the provider doesn't retry-storm) WITHOUT issuing — the
|
||
/// reconcile loop re-confirms and issues later. Pins the fail-open-on-ack /
|
||
/// fail-closed-on-issuance behavior so a future refactor can't turn this
|
||
/// into a 5xx retry storm or, worse, issue on an unconfirmable settle.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn settle_webhook_acks_without_issuing_when_provider_unreachable() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) =
|
||
install_mock_provider(MockPaymentProvider::new_status_unavailable()).await;
|
||
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"unreachable-test",
|
||
"Unreachable Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
6_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let internal_invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
let provider_invoice_id = "mock-inv-unreachable".to_string();
|
||
repo::create_invoice(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&internal_invoice_id,
|
||
&provider_invoice_id,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
6_000,
|
||
"http://mock-checkout.test/i/unreachable",
|
||
None, // buyer_email
|
||
None, // buyer_note
|
||
None, // policy_id
|
||
None, // payment_provider_id
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_invoice");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({ "kind": "settled", "provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id })),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"unconfirmable settle must ack 200, not 5xx (a non-2xx triggers retry storms)"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let status_after: String =
|
||
sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT status FROM invoices WHERE btcpay_invoice_id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&provider_invoice_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
status_after, "pending",
|
||
"unconfirmable settle must NOT flip the invoice to settled"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
licenses, 0,
|
||
"unconfirmable settle must NOT issue a license (reconciler handles it later)"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Advisory settle-amount tripwire (P1): when the provider confirms `Settled`
|
||
/// but reports a different amount than we charged, the handler STILL issues
|
||
/// the license — the amount check is advisory, NOT a gate — and records an
|
||
/// `invoice.amount_mismatch` audit row so the drift is observable. This pins
|
||
/// the deliberate non-blocking behavior: a hard gate would false-reject
|
||
/// operators running a BTCPay payment tolerance. See docs/guides/payments.md.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn settled_amount_mismatch_issues_license_but_audits() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) =
|
||
install_mock_provider(MockPaymentProvider::new_settled_with_amount(Money::sats(1))).await;
|
||
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"amount-mismatch-test",
|
||
"Amount Mismatch Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
7_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let internal_invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
let provider_invoice_id = "mock-inv-mismatch".to_string();
|
||
repo::create_invoice(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&internal_invoice_id,
|
||
&provider_invoice_id,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
7_000,
|
||
"http://mock-checkout.test/i/mismatch",
|
||
None, // buyer_email
|
||
None, // buyer_note
|
||
None, // policy_id
|
||
None, // payment_provider_id
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_invoice");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({ "kind": "settled", "provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id })),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
// The settle is confirmed (status Settled), so issuance proceeds despite
|
||
// the amount mismatch — the tripwire is advisory.
|
||
let status_after: String =
|
||
sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT status FROM invoices WHERE btcpay_invoice_id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&provider_invoice_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(status_after, "settled");
|
||
|
||
let licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(licenses, 1, "advisory amount mismatch must NOT block issuance");
|
||
|
||
// ...but the drift is recorded for the operator to investigate.
|
||
let mismatches: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action = 'invoice.amount_mismatch'",
|
||
)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
mismatches, 1,
|
||
"amount/currency drift must be recorded in the audit log"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Fiat-denominated settles have no clean SAT comparison basis, so the advisory
|
||
/// tripwire SKIPS them — issues, no audit row. This is the case of a USD
|
||
/// subscription renewal, where the provider charges in the listed fiat currency
|
||
/// (not sats) and `amount_sats` is not the charged amount. Regression guard for
|
||
/// the false-positive a naive SAT comparison would emit on every fiat renewal.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn settled_non_sat_settle_skips_amount_tripwire() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = install_mock_provider(MockPaymentProvider::new_settled_with_amount(
|
||
Money {
|
||
currency: "USD".to_string(),
|
||
amount: 999,
|
||
},
|
||
))
|
||
.await;
|
||
|
||
let product =
|
||
repo::create_product(&state.db, "non-sat-test", "Non-SAT Test", "", 7_000, &json!({}))
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
let internal_invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
let provider_invoice_id = "mock-inv-nonsat".to_string();
|
||
repo::create_invoice(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&internal_invoice_id,
|
||
&provider_invoice_id,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
7_000,
|
||
"http://mock-checkout.test/i/nonsat",
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_invoice");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({ "kind": "settled", "provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(send(&state, req).await.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
let licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(licenses, 1, "non-SAT settle must still issue the license");
|
||
let mismatches: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action = 'invoice.amount_mismatch'",
|
||
)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
mismatches, 0,
|
||
"non-SAT settle has no SAT comparison basis — skip, do NOT audit as a mismatch"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// When the provider reports no parseable amount (`None`), the tripwire has no
|
||
/// opinion and is skipped: the license issues and no `invoice.amount_mismatch`
|
||
/// row is written. Pins the "None = skip, not mismatch" contract.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn settled_without_provider_amount_skips_tripwire() {
|
||
// make_test_state_with_mock_provider uses MockPaymentProvider::new() —
|
||
// confirms Settled but reports no amount (settled_amount = None).
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state_with_mock_provider().await;
|
||
|
||
let product =
|
||
repo::create_product(&state.db, "none-amt-test", "None Amt", "", 5_000, &json!({}))
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
let internal_invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
let provider_invoice_id = "mock-inv-noneamt".to_string();
|
||
repo::create_invoice(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&internal_invoice_id,
|
||
&provider_invoice_id,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
5_000,
|
||
"http://mock-checkout.test/i/noneamt",
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_invoice");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({ "kind": "settled", "provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(send(&state, req).await.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
let licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(licenses, 1);
|
||
let mismatches: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action = 'invoice.amount_mismatch'",
|
||
)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(mismatches, 0, "no provider amount → tripwire skipped, no audit row");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// The settle webhook: provider POSTs an InvoiceSettled event, daemon
|
||
/// flips the invoice status and issues a license. Re-POSTing the same
|
||
/// webhook (which providers DO retry, sometimes aggressively) must not
|
||
/// duplicate the license — idempotency is critical because a flaky
|
||
/// network or provider retries can deliver the same event multiple
|
||
/// times. This is the production-correctness invariant we most need to
|
||
/// hold.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn webhook_settles_invoice_and_issues_license_idempotently() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state_with_mock_provider().await;
|
||
|
||
// Seed a product + a pending invoice directly via the repo (the
|
||
// HTTP purchase endpoint still uses BTCPay-specific compat code —
|
||
// see the comment block above). The webhook handler itself is on
|
||
// the abstract `PaymentProvider` trait, which the mock satisfies,
|
||
// so we can drive it through the router.
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"webhook-test",
|
||
"Webhook Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
5_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let internal_invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
let provider_invoice_id = "mock-inv-fixture".to_string();
|
||
repo::create_invoice(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&internal_invoice_id,
|
||
&provider_invoice_id,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
5_000,
|
||
"http://mock-checkout.test/i/1",
|
||
None, // buyer_email
|
||
None, // buyer_note
|
||
None, // policy_id
|
||
None, // payment_provider_id
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_invoice");
|
||
|
||
// First webhook delivery: daemon flips invoice → settled, issues
|
||
// license.
|
||
let webhook_body = json!({
|
||
"kind": "settled",
|
||
"provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id,
|
||
});
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(webhook_body.clone()),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"settle webhook should ack 200"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Verify state changes.
|
||
let status_after_first: String = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT status FROM invoices WHERE btcpay_invoice_id = ?",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&provider_invoice_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(status_after_first, "settled");
|
||
|
||
let licenses_after_first: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
licenses_after_first, 1,
|
||
"first settle webhook should issue exactly one license"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Re-deliver the same webhook. Daemon must NOT issue a second
|
||
// license — provider retries are routine and a duplicated license
|
||
// means duplicated revenue or duplicated revocation surface area.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(webhook_body),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"redelivered webhook should also ack 200"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let licenses_after_second: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
licenses_after_second, 1,
|
||
"redelivered settle webhook MUST NOT duplicate the license"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Tier caps: an Unlicensed (or Creator-tier) operator may create up
|
||
/// to `CREATOR_PRODUCT_CAP` products. The Nth+1 attempt returns 402
|
||
/// with `upgrade_url` populated so the admin SPA can render the
|
||
/// "Upgrade to Pro" CTA inline.
|
||
///
|
||
/// Then we swap the daemon's `self_tier` to a Licensed tier with the
|
||
/// `unlimited_products` entitlement (the same entitlement the master
|
||
/// Keysat issues to paying operators) and verify the same N+1 attempt
|
||
/// now succeeds. This is the dynamic-swap behavior that lets operators
|
||
/// activate a new license via the admin API and keep working without a
|
||
/// daemon restart.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn tier_caps_block_at_creator_limit_and_unlock_after_upgrade() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Reach the cap. CREATOR_PRODUCT_CAP is 5; create exactly five.
|
||
for i in 0..5 {
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": format!("p{i}"),
|
||
"name": format!("Product {i}"),
|
||
"price_sats": 1_000,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"product {i} should succeed (under cap)"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Sixth product → 402 with upgrade_url.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "p-over-cap",
|
||
"name": "Over The Cap",
|
||
"price_sats": 1_000,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::PAYMENT_REQUIRED,
|
||
"6th product should be blocked by the Creator-tier cap"
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["upgrade_url"]
|
||
.as_str()
|
||
.map_or(false, |u| u.contains("/buy/keysat")),
|
||
"402 response should carry an upgrade_url pointing at the master Keysat: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// DB should still reflect exactly 5 products — the 6th must not
|
||
// have leaked through.
|
||
let count: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM products")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(count, 5);
|
||
|
||
// Swap self_tier to a Licensed tier with `unlimited_products`.
|
||
// Mirrors what `Activate Keysat license` does in the admin UI: the
|
||
// operator pastes their Keysat-licenses-Keysat key, the daemon
|
||
// verifies it against the master pubkey, and writes the parsed
|
||
// entitlements into self_tier under a write lock — no restart.
|
||
*state.self_tier.write().await = Tier::Licensed {
|
||
license_id: Uuid::new_v4(),
|
||
product_id: Uuid::new_v4(),
|
||
expires_at: 0,
|
||
entitlements: vec!["self_host".into(), "unlimited_products".into()],
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Now the same 6th product attempt succeeds.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "p-after-upgrade",
|
||
"name": "Pro Tier Now",
|
||
"price_sats": 1_000,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"after the tier swap, the cap should no longer fire"
|
||
);
|
||
let count: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM products")
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(count, 6, "the previously-blocked product should now exist");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Webhook DLQ (dead-letter queue) — list + retry round trip.
|
||
///
|
||
/// The delivery worker retries failed deliveries with exponential
|
||
/// backoff up to 10 attempts, then sets `next_attempt_at = NULL` and
|
||
/// walks away. Pre-this-feature, those rows were invisible to the
|
||
/// operator. Now `GET /v1/admin/webhook-deliveries?status=failed`
|
||
/// surfaces them and `POST /v1/admin/webhook-deliveries/:id/retry`
|
||
/// puts them back in the queue.
|
||
///
|
||
/// We seed a "dead-lettered" row directly via SQL — the worker isn't
|
||
/// spawned in tests, so we don't need to drive 10 real failures to
|
||
/// reach the dead state. This tests the admin surface, not the
|
||
/// worker.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn webhook_dlq_lists_failed_and_retry_requeues() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let now = Utc::now().to_rfc3339();
|
||
|
||
// Configure a webhook endpoint to own the deliveries.
|
||
let endpoint_id = "ep1";
|
||
sqlx::query(
|
||
"INSERT INTO webhook_endpoints(id, url, secret, event_types, active, \
|
||
description, created_at, updated_at) \
|
||
VALUES(?, 'https://operator.example/keysat-hook', \
|
||
'0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef', '[\"*\"]', 1, '', ?, ?)",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(endpoint_id)
|
||
.bind(&now)
|
||
.bind(&now)
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// One delivery in each state: delivered (success), pending
|
||
// (in-queue), and failed (DLQ — what we mostly care about).
|
||
let mk = |id: &str, attempts: i64, next: Option<&str>, delivered: Option<&str>| {
|
||
let id = id.to_string();
|
||
let attempts = attempts;
|
||
let next = next.map(|s| s.to_string());
|
||
let delivered = delivered.map(|s| s.to_string());
|
||
let pool = state.db.clone();
|
||
let now = now.clone();
|
||
async move {
|
||
sqlx::query(
|
||
"INSERT INTO webhook_deliveries(id, endpoint_id, event_type, \
|
||
payload_json, attempt_count, next_attempt_at, delivered_at, created_at) \
|
||
VALUES(?, ?, 'license.issued', '{}', ?, ?, ?, ?)",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&id)
|
||
.bind(endpoint_id)
|
||
.bind(attempts)
|
||
.bind(next.as_deref())
|
||
.bind(delivered.as_deref())
|
||
.bind(&now)
|
||
.execute(&pool)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
}
|
||
};
|
||
mk("d-delivered", 1, None, Some(&now)).await;
|
||
mk("d-pending", 2, Some(&now), None).await;
|
||
// The dead-lettered case: 10 attempts, next_attempt_at NULL, never delivered.
|
||
mk("d-failed", 10, None, None).await;
|
||
|
||
// List with status=failed should return ONLY the dead-lettered row.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/webhook-deliveries?status=failed",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let deliveries = body["deliveries"].as_array().expect("deliveries array");
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
deliveries.len(),
|
||
1,
|
||
"status=failed should return the one DLQ row, got {deliveries:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(deliveries[0]["id"], "d-failed");
|
||
assert_eq!(deliveries[0]["attempt_count"], 10);
|
||
|
||
// Retry the dead-lettered delivery.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/webhook-deliveries/d-failed/retry",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK, "retry should succeed");
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
body["attempt_count"], 0,
|
||
"retry should reset attempt_count to 0"
|
||
);
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["next_attempt_at"].is_string(),
|
||
"retry should set next_attempt_at: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// After retry: status=failed should be empty (the row left the
|
||
// DLQ); status=pending should now contain it.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/webhook-deliveries?status=failed",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
body["deliveries"].as_array().unwrap().len(),
|
||
0,
|
||
"after retry, the row should no longer be 'failed'"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/webhook-deliveries?status=pending",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let pending = body["deliveries"].as_array().unwrap();
|
||
assert!(
|
||
pending.iter().any(|d| d["id"] == "d-failed"),
|
||
"after retry, the previously-failed row should appear in 'pending'"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Audit log captured the retry.
|
||
let audit_count: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action = 'webhook_delivery.retry' AND target_id = 'd-failed'",
|
||
)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(audit_count, 1, "retry must write an audit log entry");
|
||
|
||
// Retry on a non-existent id is 404.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/webhook-deliveries/never-existed/retry",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::NOT_FOUND);
|
||
|
||
// Bad status filter is 400 (a typo'd query string shouldn't
|
||
// silently succeed; that's a UI footgun).
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/webhook-deliveries?status=garbage",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Buyer self-service recovery: re-derive a lost license key from
|
||
/// (invoice_id, buyer_email). The most-common buyer support ticket
|
||
/// turned into a self-service flow.
|
||
///
|
||
/// Verifies:
|
||
/// - matching pair → 200 with a license_key that validates
|
||
/// - wrong email → 404 with the generic error message (does not
|
||
/// leak whether the invoice id existed)
|
||
/// - missing invoice → 404
|
||
/// - unsettled invoice → 404 (no license to recover)
|
||
/// - audit log row written on success
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn recover_returns_license_key_for_matching_pair() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
|
||
// Seed a product, a settled invoice, and an active license.
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"rec-test",
|
||
"Recover Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
5_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
repo::create_invoice(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&invoice_id,
|
||
"btcpay-rec-1",
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
5_000,
|
||
"http://x/",
|
||
Some("Buyer@Example.COM"), // mixed case to verify lowercasing
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
None, // payment_provider_id
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_invoice");
|
||
sqlx::query("UPDATE invoices SET status = 'settled' WHERE id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&invoice_id)
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let license_id = Uuid::new_v4();
|
||
let now = Utc::now().to_rfc3339();
|
||
repo::create_license(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&license_id.to_string(),
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
Some(&invoice_id),
|
||
&now,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
&[],
|
||
false,
|
||
Some("buyer@example.com"),
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_license");
|
||
|
||
// Wrong email → 404 with generic error (does not reveal the
|
||
// invoice id exists).
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/recover",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"invoice_id": invoice_id,
|
||
"email": "wrong@example.com",
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::NOT_FOUND,
|
||
"wrong email should 404"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Bogus invoice id → same generic 404.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/recover",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"invoice_id": Uuid::new_v4().to_string(),
|
||
"email": "buyer@example.com",
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::NOT_FOUND);
|
||
|
||
// Matching pair (case-insensitive email) → 200 with a real
|
||
// license key.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/recover",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"invoice_id": invoice_id,
|
||
"email": "Buyer@Example.com", // different casing on purpose
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"matching pair should succeed"
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let license_key = body["license_key"]
|
||
.as_str()
|
||
.expect("license_key should be present in response")
|
||
.to_string();
|
||
assert_eq!(body["license_id"], license_id.to_string());
|
||
|
||
// The recovered key validates round-trip via /v1/validate.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/validate",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({"key": license_key})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
let validation = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
validation["ok"], true,
|
||
"recovered key must validate cleanly: {validation:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Audit log captured the recovery.
|
||
let audit_count: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action = 'license.recovered'",
|
||
)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(audit_count, 1, "recovery must write an audit row");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// USD-priced paid purchase records the listed currency, value, and
|
||
/// exchange rate on the invoice row. Uses a manual rate pin so the
|
||
/// test is network-free and the conversion is exactly verifiable.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn paid_purchase_in_usd_records_listed_currency_and_rate() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state_with_mock_provider().await;
|
||
|
||
// Pin USD at $50,000 / BTC. $49.00 (4900 cents) → 9800 sats:
|
||
// sats = 4900 * 1_000_000 / 50000 = 98000... wait
|
||
// 4900 * 1_000_000 = 4_900_000_000
|
||
// 4_900_000_000 / 50_000 = 98_000
|
||
sqlx::query("INSERT INTO settings(key, value, updated_at) VALUES('manual_rate_pin_USD', '50000', ?)")
|
||
.bind(Utc::now().to_rfc3339())
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// USD-priced product via the typed admin endpoint.
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "usd-app",
|
||
"name": "USD App",
|
||
"price_currency": "USD",
|
||
"price_value": 4900,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
// Initiate purchase. Should call create_invoice with the rate
|
||
// recorded.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/purchase",
|
||
&[("content-type", "application/json")],
|
||
Some(json!({"product": "usd-app"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
body["amount_sats"], 98_000,
|
||
"$49.00 at $50k/BTC = 98,000 sats — got {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// The invoice row carries the audit trail.
|
||
let row: (Option<String>, Option<i64>, Option<i64>, Option<String>, i64) = sqlx::query_as(
|
||
"SELECT listed_currency, listed_value, exchange_rate_centibps, \
|
||
exchange_rate_source, amount_sats FROM invoices WHERE btcpay_invoice_id = 'mock-inv-1'"
|
||
)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(row.0.as_deref(), Some("USD"));
|
||
assert_eq!(row.1, Some(4900));
|
||
assert_eq!(row.2, Some(500_000_000), "rate × 10000: 50000 × 10000");
|
||
assert_eq!(row.3.as_deref(), Some("manual_pin"));
|
||
assert_eq!(row.4, 98_000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Zaprite webhook authentication contract.
|
||
///
|
||
/// Zaprite doesn't sign webhooks (verified May 2026 — no HMAC,
|
||
/// no JWT, no header-based signature). The defense Keysat uses is
|
||
/// the externalUniqId round-trip: we set our local invoice UUID
|
||
/// as the order's externalUniqId at creation, and the webhook
|
||
/// handler trusts the body only insofar as we can match the
|
||
/// Zaprite order id back to a local invoice we created.
|
||
///
|
||
/// This test pins the validate_webhook impl's parsing contract:
|
||
/// - extracts the order id from `data.id` (Zaprite's payload shape)
|
||
/// - maps event types to ProviderWebhookEvent variants
|
||
/// - rejects payloads missing an order id
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn zaprite_webhook_event_parsing() {
|
||
use keysat::payment::{
|
||
zaprite::{ZapriteClient, ZapriteProvider},
|
||
PaymentProvider, ProviderWebhookEvent,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// We don't talk to Zaprite for this test — just exercise the
|
||
// pure-parsing branch of validate_webhook. Construct a client
|
||
// with bogus credentials; never used here.
|
||
let provider = ZapriteProvider::new(ZapriteClient::new(
|
||
"https://api.zaprite.test",
|
||
"test-key-not-used",
|
||
));
|
||
let headers = axum::http::HeaderMap::new();
|
||
|
||
// order.paid → InvoiceSettled
|
||
let body = br#"{"event":"order.paid","data":{"id":"zap-order-1"}}"#;
|
||
let event = provider.validate_webhook(&headers, body).expect("parse");
|
||
match event {
|
||
ProviderWebhookEvent::InvoiceSettled { provider_invoice_id } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(provider_invoice_id, "zap-order-1");
|
||
}
|
||
other => panic!("expected InvoiceSettled, got {other:?}"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// order.complete + order.overpaid → also Settled (operator gets paid)
|
||
for kind in &["order.complete", "order.overpaid"] {
|
||
let body = format!(r#"{{"event":"{kind}","data":{{"id":"x"}}}}"#);
|
||
let event = provider
|
||
.validate_webhook(&headers, body.as_bytes())
|
||
.expect("parse");
|
||
assert!(
|
||
matches!(event, ProviderWebhookEvent::InvoiceSettled { .. }),
|
||
"{kind} should map to Settled"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// order.expired → InvoiceExpired
|
||
let body = br#"{"event":"order.expired","data":{"id":"zap-order-2"}}"#;
|
||
let event = provider.validate_webhook(&headers, body).expect("parse");
|
||
assert!(matches!(
|
||
event,
|
||
ProviderWebhookEvent::InvoiceExpired { .. }
|
||
));
|
||
|
||
// order.refunded → InvoiceRefunded
|
||
let body = br#"{"event":"order.refunded","data":{"id":"zap-order-3"}}"#;
|
||
let event = provider.validate_webhook(&headers, body).expect("parse");
|
||
assert!(matches!(
|
||
event,
|
||
ProviderWebhookEvent::InvoiceRefunded { .. }
|
||
));
|
||
|
||
// Unknown event type → Other (forward-compat for new event
|
||
// kinds Zaprite ships in the future)
|
||
let body = br#"{"event":"order.partially_refunded","data":{"id":"zap-order-4"}}"#;
|
||
let event = provider.validate_webhook(&headers, body).expect("parse");
|
||
match event {
|
||
ProviderWebhookEvent::Other { kind, provider_invoice_id } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(kind, "order.partially_refunded");
|
||
assert_eq!(provider_invoice_id.as_deref(), Some("zap-order-4"));
|
||
}
|
||
other => panic!("expected Other, got {other:?}"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Missing order id → reject. An attacker can't trigger any
|
||
// local state change without telling us which order to act on.
|
||
let body = br#"{"event":"order.paid","data":{}}"#;
|
||
let result = provider.validate_webhook(&headers, body);
|
||
assert!(
|
||
result.is_err(),
|
||
"payload without order id must be rejected"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Malformed JSON → reject.
|
||
let body = b"not json at all";
|
||
let result = provider.validate_webhook(&headers, body);
|
||
assert!(result.is_err());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Zaprite provider self-identifies as `ProviderKind::Zaprite`.
|
||
/// Trivial but pins the kind() return for the call sites that
|
||
/// switch on provider identity (e.g., audit log strings).
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn zaprite_provider_kind() {
|
||
use keysat::payment::{
|
||
zaprite::{ZapriteClient, ZapriteProvider},
|
||
PaymentProvider, ProviderKind,
|
||
};
|
||
let p = ZapriteProvider::new(ZapriteClient::new(
|
||
"https://api.zaprite.test",
|
||
"test-key",
|
||
));
|
||
assert_eq!(p.kind(), ProviderKind::Zaprite);
|
||
assert_eq!(p.kind().as_str(), "zaprite");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Rate fetcher: manual pin in settings table overrides the source
|
||
/// chain. Locks in the test-mode + maintenance-window contract that
|
||
/// other phases (invoice rate recording, buy-page rendering) rely on.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn rate_cache_honors_manual_pin_from_settings() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
|
||
// Pin USD at $65,000 / BTC. The fetcher MUST return this value
|
||
// without hitting any external API.
|
||
sqlx::query("INSERT INTO settings(key, value, updated_at) VALUES('manual_rate_pin_USD', '65000', ?)")
|
||
.bind(Utc::now().to_rfc3339())
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let rate = keysat::rates::get_rate(&state, "USD")
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("manual pin should resolve without network");
|
||
assert_eq!(rate.units_per_btc, 65000.0);
|
||
assert_eq!(rate.source, "manual_pin");
|
||
|
||
// Convert $49.00 (4900 cents) to sats. At $65k/BTC:
|
||
// sats = 4900 * 1_000_000 / 65000 = 75,384.6 → 75,385.
|
||
let conv = keysat::rates::convert_to_sats(&state, "USD", 4900)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("convert");
|
||
assert_eq!(conv.sats, 75_385, "rounding tie-break: 75384.615 rounds to 75385");
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
conv.rate_centibps,
|
||
Some(650_000_000),
|
||
"rate stored as units×10000: 65000 × 10000"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// SAT-currency conversions are identity (no rate involved).
|
||
let sat_conv = keysat::rates::convert_to_sats(&state, "SAT", 50_000)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(sat_conv.sats, 50_000);
|
||
assert!(sat_conv.rate_centibps.is_none());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Admin endpoint visibility: GET /v1/admin/rates returns whatever
|
||
/// is currently cached, including manual pins. Operators can verify
|
||
/// the daemon's current quote against external sources before
|
||
/// trusting fiat-priced invoice flows.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_rates_endpoint_reflects_manual_pin() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
sqlx::query("INSERT INTO settings(key, value, updated_at) VALUES('manual_rate_pin_USD', '60000', ?)")
|
||
.bind(Utc::now().to_rfc3339())
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// Trigger a rate read so the cache populates.
|
||
let _ = keysat::rates::get_rate(&state, "USD").await.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/rates",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let rates = body["rates"].as_array().expect("rates array");
|
||
let usd = rates
|
||
.iter()
|
||
.find(|r| r["currency"] == "USD")
|
||
.expect("USD entry should be present");
|
||
assert_eq!(usd["units_per_btc"], 60_000.0);
|
||
assert_eq!(usd["source"], "manual_pin");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Multi-currency product creation. The admin endpoint accepts both
|
||
/// the legacy SAT-only form (`price_sats: N`) and the new typed form
|
||
/// (`price_currency + price_value`). Verifies:
|
||
/// - legacy form still works, produces a SAT-currency row
|
||
/// - typed SAT form works, dual-writes price_sats correctly
|
||
/// - typed USD form works, leaves price_sats=0 (filled at invoice time)
|
||
/// - unknown currency code → 400
|
||
/// - inconsistent legacy + typed values → 400 (catches half-migrated clients)
|
||
/// - typed without value → 400; value without currency → 400
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_create_product_accepts_legacy_and_typed_currency_forms() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Legacy SAT form.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"slug": "legacy", "name": "Legacy", "price_sats": 50000})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_sats"], 50_000);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_currency"], "SAT");
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_value"], 50_000);
|
||
|
||
// Typed SAT form.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "typed-sat",
|
||
"name": "Typed SAT",
|
||
"price_currency": "SAT",
|
||
"price_value": 75000,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_sats"], 75_000);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_currency"], "SAT");
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_value"], 75_000);
|
||
|
||
// Typed USD form: $49.00 = 4900 cents. price_sats stays 0 until
|
||
// the first invoice triggers a rate lookup.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "typed-usd",
|
||
"name": "Typed USD",
|
||
"price_currency": "USD",
|
||
"price_value": 4900,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_currency"], "USD");
|
||
assert_eq!(body["price_value"], 4900);
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
body["price_sats"], 0,
|
||
"USD products should have price_sats=0 until first invoice rate-converts them"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Bad currency.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "bad-currency",
|
||
"name": "Bad",
|
||
"price_currency": "GBP",
|
||
"price_value": 100,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST);
|
||
|
||
// Inconsistent legacy + typed (catches half-migrated clients).
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "inconsistent",
|
||
"name": "Inconsistent",
|
||
"price_sats": 50000,
|
||
"price_currency": "USD",
|
||
"price_value": 4900,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST,
|
||
"mismatched legacy + typed pricing should 400"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Half-form: currency without value.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "half-1",
|
||
"name": "Half 1",
|
||
"price_currency": "USD",
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST);
|
||
|
||
// Half-form: value without currency.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "half-2",
|
||
"name": "Half 2",
|
||
"price_value": 4900,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Community analytics: opt-in toggle + privacy contract.
|
||
///
|
||
/// Locks in two invariants:
|
||
/// - Default state is OFF; no install_uuid generated.
|
||
/// - Enabling generates a fresh install_uuid; the heartbeat
|
||
/// preview's counts are floored to the nearest 5 (anti-
|
||
/// fingerprinting); no operator-identifying fields are present.
|
||
/// - Bad collector URL → 400 (must start with http:// or https://).
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn community_analytics_opt_in_and_privacy_contract() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Default state: disabled, no install_uuid yet.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/community-analytics",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["enabled"], false, "must default to off");
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["install_uuid"].is_null(),
|
||
"no UUID should exist before opt-in"
|
||
);
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["collector_url"].is_null(),
|
||
"no URL should exist before opt-in"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Bad URL → 400.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/community-analytics",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"enabled": true, "collector_url": "ftp://wrong"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST);
|
||
|
||
// Enabling without a URL is allowed (armed but silent).
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/community-analytics",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"enabled": true, "collector_url": null})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
// Now an install_uuid exists.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/community-analytics",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["enabled"], true);
|
||
let uuid = body["install_uuid"]
|
||
.as_str()
|
||
.expect("install_uuid should be present after opt-in");
|
||
assert_eq!(uuid.len(), 36, "install_uuid should be a UUIDv4 string");
|
||
|
||
// Privacy contract: the preview heartbeat MUST contain only
|
||
// anonymized fields. Specifically, no operator_name, no
|
||
// public_url, no store_id, no api keys, no buyer info.
|
||
let preview = &body["preview_heartbeat"];
|
||
let preview_str =
|
||
serde_json::to_string(preview).expect("preview should serialize");
|
||
for forbidden in &[
|
||
"operator_name",
|
||
"public_url",
|
||
"store_id",
|
||
"api_key",
|
||
"buyer_email",
|
||
"btcpay_url",
|
||
] {
|
||
assert!(
|
||
!preview_str.contains(forbidden),
|
||
"preview heartbeat must not contain '{forbidden}': {preview_str}"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
// Counts must be floored to the nearest 5. Seed 23 active
|
||
// licenses → counts.active_licenses must be 20.
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"ana-prod",
|
||
"Analytics Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
100,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
for _ in 0..23 {
|
||
let lid = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
repo::create_license(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&lid,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
None,
|
||
&Utc::now().to_rfc3339(),
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
&[],
|
||
false,
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
}
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/community-analytics",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let preview = &body["preview_heartbeat"];
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
preview["counts"]["active_licenses"], 20,
|
||
"23 licenses must floor to 20 (anti-fingerprinting): {preview:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Reset wipes the UUID.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/community-analytics/reset",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/community-analytics",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(send(&state, req).await).await;
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["install_uuid"].is_null(),
|
||
"install_uuid must be wiped after reset: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// Recurring-subscription policy admin (Phase 4 of recurring subs)
|
||
//
|
||
// The renewal worker (src/subscriptions.rs + tests/subscriptions.rs)
|
||
// has its own coverage. This block is about the ADMIN surface — can an
|
||
// operator create a recurring policy through the API, can they edit
|
||
// it, and does the public buy-page endpoint surface the right cadence
|
||
// fields for the front-end to render?
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// Helper: swap `state.self_tier` to a Pro-equivalent licensed tier
|
||
/// (carries `unlimited_products`, `unlimited_policies`, AND
|
||
/// `recurring_billing`). Mirrors what `Activate Keysat license` does
|
||
/// in production.
|
||
async fn upgrade_to_pro(state: &AppState) {
|
||
*state.self_tier.write().await = Tier::Licensed {
|
||
license_id: Uuid::new_v4(),
|
||
product_id: Uuid::new_v4(),
|
||
expires_at: 0,
|
||
entitlements: vec![
|
||
"self_host".into(),
|
||
"unlimited_products".into(),
|
||
"unlimited_policies".into(),
|
||
"unlimited_codes".into(),
|
||
"recurring_billing".into(),
|
||
"card_payments".into(),
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Operator on Creator tier (no `recurring_billing` entitlement)
|
||
/// cannot create a recurring policy. The 402 should mention upgrade.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn recurring_policy_blocked_on_creator_tier() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Seed a product so `product_slug` lookup succeeds and the test
|
||
// exercises the recurring-feature gate, not the not-found path.
|
||
let _ = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"rec-blocked",
|
||
"Blocked",
|
||
"",
|
||
100_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/policies",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"product_slug": "rec-blocked",
|
||
"name": "Monthly",
|
||
"slug": "monthly",
|
||
"is_recurring": true,
|
||
"renewal_period_days": 30
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::PAYMENT_REQUIRED,
|
||
"Creator tier must see 402 for recurring=true; got {}",
|
||
resp.status()
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["upgrade_url"].as_str().unwrap_or("").contains("buy/keysat"),
|
||
"402 should carry an upgrade_url to the master Keysat: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Operator on Pro tier can create a monthly subscription policy. The
|
||
/// stored row carries the recurring fields, the public list endpoint
|
||
/// echoes them, and the policies admin list shows is_recurring=true.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn pro_tier_creates_monthly_recurring_policy() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
upgrade_to_pro(&state).await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
let _ = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"rec-product",
|
||
"Recurring Product",
|
||
"",
|
||
25_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
// Create a recurring monthly policy with a 14-day trial.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/policies",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"product_slug": "rec-product",
|
||
"name": "Monthly",
|
||
"slug": "monthly",
|
||
"duration_seconds": 30 * 86_400,
|
||
"max_machines": 1,
|
||
"is_recurring": true,
|
||
"renewal_period_days": 30,
|
||
"grace_period_days": 7,
|
||
"trial_days": 14
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"create with Pro tier should succeed; got {}",
|
||
resp.status()
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["is_recurring"], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["renewal_period_days"], 30);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["grace_period_days"], 7);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["trial_days"], 14);
|
||
|
||
// Public buy-page API surfaces the same shape so the JS price
|
||
// renderer can reach for it.
|
||
let req = build_request("GET", "/v1/products/rec-product/policies", &[], None);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let policies = body["policies"].as_array().expect("policies array");
|
||
let monthly = policies
|
||
.iter()
|
||
.find(|p| p["slug"] == "monthly")
|
||
.expect("monthly policy in public list");
|
||
assert_eq!(monthly["is_recurring"], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(monthly["renewal_period_days"], 30);
|
||
assert_eq!(monthly["trial_days"], 14);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Validation: recurring=true with renewal_period_days=0 must be rejected.
|
||
/// Catches a foot-gun where the operator forgets to fill in the cadence.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn recurring_requires_positive_period() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
upgrade_to_pro(&state).await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
let _ = repo::create_product(&state.db, "rec-bad", "Bad", "", 100, &json!({}))
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/policies",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"product_slug": "rec-bad",
|
||
"name": "Bad",
|
||
"slug": "bad",
|
||
"is_recurring": true,
|
||
"renewal_period_days": 0
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST,
|
||
"is_recurring=true with renewal_period_days=0 must be rejected"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Edit-policy can flip a non-recurring policy to recurring on Pro tier
|
||
/// and a Pro-tier-gated operator gets a 402 trying the same.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn edit_policy_to_recurring_respects_tier_gate() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Pre-create product + non-recurring policy directly via the repo,
|
||
// so we don't need to go through Pro tier just for setup.
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"rec-edit",
|
||
"Edit Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
100_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
let policy = repo::create_policy(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
"Default",
|
||
"default",
|
||
0,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
false,
|
||
None,
|
||
&[],
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
None,
|
||
repo::RecurringConfig::off(),
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_policy");
|
||
|
||
// Creator-tier attempt to flip is_recurring=true → 402.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"PATCH",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/policies/{}", policy.id),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"is_recurring": true,
|
||
"renewal_period_days": 30
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::PAYMENT_REQUIRED,
|
||
"flipping a policy to recurring on Creator tier must 402"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Upgrade and try again.
|
||
upgrade_to_pro(&state).await;
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"PATCH",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/policies/{}", policy.id),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"is_recurring": true,
|
||
"renewal_period_days": 30,
|
||
"trial_days": 7
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"Pro tier can flip a policy to recurring"
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["is_recurring"], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["renewal_period_days"], 30);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["trial_days"], 7);
|
||
|
||
// Idempotency: a second PATCH that LEAVES is_recurring true should
|
||
// succeed and not re-fire the tier gate. Drop back to Creator and
|
||
// PATCH a tangential field — must still work.
|
||
*state.self_tier.write().await = Tier::Unlicensed {
|
||
reason: "downgraded".into(),
|
||
};
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"PATCH",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/policies/{}", policy.id),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "name": "Renamed Default" })),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"name-only patch on a recurring policy must not re-fire the tier gate"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// Subscription cancellation (Phase 6)
|
||
//
|
||
// Admin cancel: full trust, just needs the bearer token + the sub id.
|
||
// Buyer cancel: auth via license key in the body. The cancelled state
|
||
// is terminal — license stays valid through end-of-cycle, renewal
|
||
// worker stops creating new invoices, webhook fires.
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// Helper: seed a license + active subscription tied to it, plus a
|
||
/// product + recurring policy. Returns (license_id, sub_id, key_string)
|
||
/// where `key_string` is the signed license key the buyer would have
|
||
/// in hand (used by the self-service cancel test).
|
||
async fn seed_subscription(state: &AppState) -> (String, String, String) {
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"sub-cancel-prod",
|
||
"Cancel Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
25_000,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
let policy = repo::create_policy(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
"Monthly",
|
||
"monthly",
|
||
30 * 86_400,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
false,
|
||
None,
|
||
&[],
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
None,
|
||
repo::RecurringConfig {
|
||
is_recurring: true,
|
||
renewal_period_days: 30,
|
||
grace_period_days: 7,
|
||
trial_days: 0,
|
||
},
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_policy");
|
||
|
||
let license_id = Uuid::new_v4();
|
||
let issued_at = Utc::now();
|
||
repo::create_license(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&license_id.to_string(),
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
None,
|
||
&issued_at.to_rfc3339(),
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
Some(&policy.id),
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
&[],
|
||
false,
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_license");
|
||
|
||
// Seed a placeholder cycle-1 invoice so the FK on subscription_invoices
|
||
// is satisfiable — the invoice details don't matter for the cancel
|
||
// tests, only that a row exists.
|
||
let invoice_id = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
sqlx::query(
|
||
"INSERT INTO invoices(id, btcpay_invoice_id, product_id, amount_sats, \
|
||
checkout_url, status, created_at, updated_at, listed_currency, \
|
||
listed_value, policy_id) \
|
||
VALUES(?, ?, ?, 0, ?, 'pending', ?, ?, 'SAT', 0, ?)",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&invoice_id)
|
||
.bind(&format!("test-inv-{}", &invoice_id[..8]))
|
||
.bind(&product.id)
|
||
.bind("http://test.invalid/inv")
|
||
.bind(issued_at.to_rfc3339())
|
||
.bind(issued_at.to_rfc3339())
|
||
.bind(&policy.id)
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("seed invoice");
|
||
|
||
let sub = keysat::subscriptions::create_subscription(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&license_id.to_string(),
|
||
&policy.id,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
30,
|
||
"SAT",
|
||
25_000,
|
||
&invoice_id,
|
||
None, // merchant_profile_id
|
||
None, // payment_provider_id
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_subscription");
|
||
|
||
// Build a real signed key the buyer-cancel endpoint can verify.
|
||
let product_uuid = Uuid::parse_str(&product.id).expect("product id is uuid");
|
||
let payload = LicensePayload {
|
||
version: 2,
|
||
flags: 0,
|
||
product_id: product_uuid,
|
||
license_id,
|
||
issued_at: issued_at.timestamp(),
|
||
expires_at: 0,
|
||
fingerprint_hash: [0; 32],
|
||
entitlements: vec![],
|
||
};
|
||
let signature = crypto::sign_payload(&state.keypair.signing, &payload);
|
||
let key_string = crypto::encode_key(&payload, &signature);
|
||
|
||
(license_id.to_string(), sub.id, key_string)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_cancel_subscription_happy_path() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let (_license_id, sub_id, _key) = seed_subscription(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
// Cancel.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/subscriptions/{}/cancel", sub_id),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"reason": "customer requested"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["ok"], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["status"], "cancelled");
|
||
|
||
// DB row reflects the new state + cancelled_at is stamped.
|
||
let (status, cancelled_at): (String, Option<String>) = sqlx::query_as(
|
||
"SELECT status, cancelled_at FROM subscriptions WHERE id = ?",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&sub_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(status, "cancelled");
|
||
assert!(cancelled_at.is_some(), "cancelled_at must be stamped");
|
||
|
||
// Audit row exists.
|
||
let n: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action = 'subscription.cancel' \
|
||
AND target_id = ?",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&sub_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(n, 1, "exactly one audit row for the cancel");
|
||
|
||
// Idempotency: cancelling a cancelled sub returns ok with the prior state.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/subscriptions/{}/cancel", sub_id),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["already"], "cancelled");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_cancel_unknown_subscription_404s() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/subscriptions/no-such-sub/cancel",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::NOT_FOUND);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn buyer_cancel_subscription_via_license_key() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let (_license_id, sub_id, key_string) = seed_subscription(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
// Buyer self-cancels by POSTing the signed key. No admin auth.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/subscriptions/cancel",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"license_key": key_string,
|
||
"reason": "no longer needed"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"buyer cancel should succeed with a valid key"
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["status"], "cancelled");
|
||
assert_eq!(body["subscription_id"], sub_id);
|
||
|
||
// Audit row carries actor=buyer.
|
||
let actor: Option<String> = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT actor_kind FROM audit_log WHERE target_id = ? \
|
||
AND action = 'subscription.cancel'",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&sub_id)
|
||
.fetch_optional(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
actor.as_deref(),
|
||
Some("buyer_license_key"),
|
||
"audit must record the buyer-key actor kind"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// Tier upgrade endpoints (Phase 3 of TIER_UPGRADES_DESIGN)
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// Seed a USD perpetual product with Standard (rank 1) + Pro (rank 2)
|
||
/// policies, plus a license under Standard with a real signed key the
|
||
/// buyer would hold. Returns (license_id, key_string, standard_id, pro_id).
|
||
async fn seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(state: &AppState) -> (String, String, String, String) {
|
||
let product = repo::create_product(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
"upgrade-test",
|
||
"Upgrade Test",
|
||
"",
|
||
2500,
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_product");
|
||
sqlx::query("UPDATE products SET price_currency='USD', price_value=2500 WHERE id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&product.id)
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
let standard = repo::create_policy(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
"Standard",
|
||
"standard",
|
||
0,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
false,
|
||
Some(2500),
|
||
&["core".into()],
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
None,
|
||
repo::RecurringConfig::off(),
|
||
Some(1),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create standard");
|
||
let pro = repo::create_policy(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
"Pro",
|
||
"pro",
|
||
0,
|
||
0,
|
||
3,
|
||
false,
|
||
Some(7500),
|
||
&["core".into(), "ai_summaries".into()],
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
None,
|
||
repo::RecurringConfig::off(),
|
||
Some(2),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create pro");
|
||
|
||
let license_id = Uuid::new_v4();
|
||
let issued_at = Utc::now();
|
||
repo::create_license(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&license_id.to_string(),
|
||
&product.id,
|
||
None,
|
||
&issued_at.to_rfc3339(),
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
Some(&standard.id),
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
&["core".to_string()],
|
||
false,
|
||
None,
|
||
None,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_license");
|
||
|
||
let product_uuid = Uuid::parse_str(&product.id).expect("product id is uuid");
|
||
let payload = LicensePayload {
|
||
version: 2,
|
||
flags: 0,
|
||
product_id: product_uuid,
|
||
license_id,
|
||
issued_at: issued_at.timestamp(),
|
||
expires_at: 0,
|
||
fingerprint_hash: [0; 32],
|
||
entitlements: vec!["core".into()],
|
||
};
|
||
let signature = crypto::sign_payload(&state.keypair.signing, &payload);
|
||
let key_string = crypto::encode_key(&payload, &signature);
|
||
|
||
(license_id.to_string(), key_string, standard.id, pro.id)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// `/v1/upgrade-quote` returns the prorated charge for a valid
|
||
/// license + target combo.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn upgrade_quote_returns_perpetual_difference() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let (_lic, key, _std, _pro) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/upgrade-quote",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"license_key": key,
|
||
"target_policy_slug": "pro"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["direction"], "upgrade");
|
||
assert_eq!(body["listed_currency"], "USD");
|
||
// Pro $75 - Standard $25 = $50 = 5000 cents.
|
||
assert_eq!(body["proration_charge_value"], 5000);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["effective_at"], "immediate");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn upgrade_quote_rejects_garbage_key() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/upgrade-quote",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"license_key": "not-a-real-key",
|
||
"target_policy_slug": "pro"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::UNAUTHORIZED);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn upgrade_quote_rejects_unknown_target_policy() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let (_lic, key, _, _) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/upgrade-quote",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"license_key": key,
|
||
"target_policy_slug": "no-such-policy"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::NOT_FOUND);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// `/v1/upgrade` against a paid path: creates a real provider invoice
|
||
/// (mock), persists a tier_changes row, returns checkout URL.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn upgrade_start_creates_invoice_and_tier_change_row() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state_with_mock_provider().await;
|
||
// Pin a USD/BTC rate so the rates fetcher doesn't try the network
|
||
// when we hit the upgrade path.
|
||
sqlx::query(
|
||
"INSERT INTO settings(key, value, updated_at) \
|
||
VALUES('manual_rate_pin_USD', '50000', ?)",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(Utc::now().to_rfc3339())
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let (license_id, key, _std, pro_id) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/upgrade",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"license_key": key,
|
||
"target_policy_slug": "pro"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"upgrade start should succeed; got {}",
|
||
resp.status()
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let invoice_id = body["invoice_id"].as_str().expect("invoice_id").to_string();
|
||
assert!(body["checkout_url"].as_str().unwrap().contains("mock-checkout"));
|
||
assert_eq!(body["proration_charge_value"], 5000); // 5000 cents
|
||
assert!(body["amount_sats"].as_i64().unwrap() > 0,
|
||
"fiat conversion should produce a non-zero sat charge");
|
||
|
||
// tier_changes row exists with this invoice_id.
|
||
let tc = keysat::upgrades::get_tier_change_by_invoice(&state.db, &invoice_id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap()
|
||
.expect("tier_change row");
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.license_id, license_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.to_policy_id, pro_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.actor, "buyer");
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.direction, "upgrade");
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.invoice_id.as_deref(), Some(invoice_id.as_str()));
|
||
|
||
// License is NOT yet on Pro — that happens on settle (next test).
|
||
let license_now = repo::get_license_by_id(&state.db, &license_id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap()
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_ne!(
|
||
license_now.policy_id.as_deref(),
|
||
Some(pro_id.as_str()),
|
||
"license should NOT change tier until invoice settles"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Webhook settle on a tier-change invoice applies the change instead
|
||
/// of issuing a new license.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn webhook_settle_on_tier_change_applies_instead_of_issuing() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state_with_mock_provider().await;
|
||
sqlx::query(
|
||
"INSERT INTO settings(key, value, updated_at) \
|
||
VALUES('manual_rate_pin_USD', '50000', ?)",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(Utc::now().to_rfc3339())
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let (license_id, key, _std, pro_id) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
// Start the upgrade, capture the provider invoice id.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/upgrade",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"license_key": key,
|
||
"target_policy_slug": "pro"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let invoice_id = body["invoice_id"].as_str().unwrap().to_string();
|
||
let provider_invoice_id = body["provider_invoice_id"].as_str().unwrap().to_string();
|
||
|
||
// Fire a "settled" webhook on that invoice. The MockPaymentProvider's
|
||
// validate_webhook reads the body as JSON.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"kind": "settled",
|
||
"provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"webhook should ack 200 on tier-change settle"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// The license is now on Pro. No NEW license was issued (count
|
||
// for this product still 1).
|
||
let license_after = repo::get_license_by_id(&state.db, &license_id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap()
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
license_after.policy_id.as_deref(),
|
||
Some(pro_id.as_str()),
|
||
"settle webhook should have applied the tier change"
|
||
);
|
||
assert!(
|
||
license_after.entitlements.contains(&"ai_summaries".to_string()),
|
||
"Pro entitlements should now be on the license: {:?}",
|
||
license_after.entitlements
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let n_licenses: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses WHERE product_id = ?",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&license_after.product_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
n_licenses, 1,
|
||
"tier-change must NOT issue a new license; count must stay at 1"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Re-delivering the same webhook is idempotent.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/btcpay/webhook",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"kind": "settled",
|
||
"provider_invoice_id": provider_invoice_id
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK, "re-delivery must ack 200");
|
||
let n_licenses_after: i64 = sqlx::query_scalar(
|
||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM licenses WHERE product_id = ?",
|
||
)
|
||
.bind(&license_after.product_id)
|
||
.fetch_one(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(n_licenses_after, 1, "re-delivery must not duplicate licenses");
|
||
|
||
// Suppress unused-var warning: invoice_id is used implicitly via
|
||
// the tier_changes lookup but kept named for readability.
|
||
let _ = invoice_id;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Admin can force-change a license to any policy under the same
|
||
/// product. skip_payment=true applies immediately with no invoice.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_change_tier_skip_payment_applies_immediately() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let (license_id, _key, _std, pro_id) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/licenses/{license_id}/change-tier"),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"to_policy_slug": "pro",
|
||
"skip_payment": true,
|
||
"reason": "comp upgrade per support ticket #1234"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["applied"], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(body["skip_payment"], true);
|
||
let tc_id = body["tier_change_id"].as_str().unwrap().to_string();
|
||
|
||
let license_after = repo::get_license_by_id(&state.db, &license_id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap()
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
license_after.policy_id.as_deref(),
|
||
Some(pro_id.as_str()),
|
||
"skip_payment=true should apply on the spot"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
let tc = keysat::upgrades::get_tier_change(&state.db, &tc_id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap()
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.actor, "admin");
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.proration_charge_value, 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(tc.invoice_id, None, "comp upgrade has no invoice");
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
tc.reason.as_deref(),
|
||
Some("comp upgrade per support ticket #1234")
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Admin can force a perpetual downgrade. Buyer endpoint rejects
|
||
/// these (refund decision per design doc).
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_change_tier_allows_perpetual_downgrade() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let (license_id, _key, std_id, pro_id) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
sqlx::query("UPDATE licenses SET policy_id = ? WHERE id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&pro_id)
|
||
.bind(&license_id)
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/licenses/{license_id}/change-tier"),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"to_policy_slug": "standard",
|
||
"skip_payment": true,
|
||
"reason": "honoring partial refund"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let license_after = repo::get_license_by_id(&state.db, &license_id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap()
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(license_after.policy_id.as_deref(), Some(std_id.as_str()));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_change_tier_rejects_zero_charge_paid_path() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let (license_id, _key, std_id, _pro) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
let std_policy = repo::get_policy_by_id(&state.db, &std_id).await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||
let _sideways = repo::create_policy(
|
||
&state.db,
|
||
&std_policy.product_id,
|
||
"Standard Plus",
|
||
"standard-plus",
|
||
0,
|
||
0,
|
||
1,
|
||
false,
|
||
Some(2500),
|
||
&["core".into()],
|
||
&json!({}),
|
||
None,
|
||
0,
|
||
None,
|
||
repo::RecurringConfig::off(),
|
||
Some(1),
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/licenses/{license_id}/change-tier"),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"to_policy_slug": "standard-plus",
|
||
"skip_payment": false
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["message"].as_str().unwrap_or("").contains("skip_payment"),
|
||
"error should hint at the skip_payment toggle: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn admin_change_tier_requires_admin_token() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let (license_id, _key, _std, _pro) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/licenses/{license_id}/change-tier"),
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({"to_policy_slug": "pro", "skip_payment": true})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::UNAUTHORIZED);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Buyer-initiated downgrade is rejected from this endpoint in v0.2.x
|
||
/// (Phase 4 admin endpoint covers downgrades).
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn upgrade_endpoint_rejects_buyer_downgrade() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let (lic, _key, std_id, pro_id) = seed_perpetual_ladder_with_key(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
// Move the license to Pro by direct SQL so we can attempt a
|
||
// downgrade back to Standard. (Real flow: admin would have done
|
||
// this; we don't have an admin-change-tier endpoint until Phase 4.)
|
||
sqlx::query("UPDATE licenses SET policy_id = ? WHERE id = ?")
|
||
.bind(&pro_id)
|
||
.bind(&lic)
|
||
.execute(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// Re-sign a key for the now-Pro license. We can reuse the same
|
||
// license_id + product_id — the entitlements in the payload are
|
||
// not checked by the upgrade endpoint (it goes by license_id).
|
||
let license = repo::get_license_by_id(&state.db, &lic).await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||
let product_uuid = Uuid::parse_str(&license.product_id).unwrap();
|
||
let payload = LicensePayload {
|
||
version: 2,
|
||
flags: 0,
|
||
product_id: product_uuid,
|
||
license_id: Uuid::parse_str(&lic).unwrap(),
|
||
issued_at: Utc::now().timestamp(),
|
||
expires_at: 0,
|
||
fingerprint_hash: [0; 32],
|
||
entitlements: vec![],
|
||
};
|
||
let signature = crypto::sign_payload(&state.keypair.signing, &payload);
|
||
let key_string = crypto::encode_key(&payload, &signature);
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/upgrade",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"license_key": key_string,
|
||
"target_policy_slug": "standard"
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
// The quote function intercepts perpetual downgrades with a 400
|
||
// "admin-only" before the endpoint's blanket-Forbidden check
|
||
// fires. Either status is "this is not a buyer path"; the
|
||
// message-level distinction matters more than the code.
|
||
let status = resp.status();
|
||
assert!(
|
||
status == StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST || status == StatusCode::FORBIDDEN,
|
||
"buyer-initiated downgrade must be 400 or 403; got {status}"
|
||
);
|
||
if status == StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST {
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert!(
|
||
body["message"].as_str().unwrap_or("").contains("admin-only"),
|
||
"400 should explain that downgrades are admin-only: {body:?}"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let _ = std_id;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn buyer_cancel_rejects_garbage_key() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let _ = seed_subscription(&state).await;
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/subscriptions/cancel",
|
||
&[],
|
||
Some(json!({"license_key": "not-a-real-key"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::UNAUTHORIZED,
|
||
"garbage key must be 401, not 404 — don't leak which subs exist"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
// 0.2.0:12 — Scoped API keys + OpenAPI spec + Zaprite gate
|
||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
/// `GET /v1/openapi.json` — public, no auth. Returns a parseable spec
|
||
/// with the agent-relevant subset of endpoints documented.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn openapi_spec_serves_valid_json() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let req = build_request("GET", "/v1/openapi.json", &[], None);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let v = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(v["openapi"], "3.1.0");
|
||
assert!(v["paths"].as_object().expect("paths is object").len() > 5);
|
||
// Spot-check that the agent-relevant endpoints are present.
|
||
assert!(v.pointer("/paths/~1v1~1admin~1api-keys").is_some());
|
||
assert!(v.pointer("/paths/~1v1~1admin~1licenses").is_some());
|
||
assert!(v.pointer("/paths/~1v1~1validate").is_some());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// `POST /v1/admin/api-keys` — master admin creates a scoped key, the
|
||
/// raw token comes back once, and the role is recorded. Subsequent
|
||
/// `GET /v1/admin/api-keys` lists it without the token.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn scoped_api_key_create_list_revoke_round_trip() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Create with a recognized role.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/api-keys",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"label": "Smoke test bot", "role": "license-issuer"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let token = body["token"].as_str().expect("token returned");
|
||
assert!(token.starts_with("ks_"), "scoped token must use ks_ prefix");
|
||
let key_id = body["id"].as_str().expect("id returned").to_string();
|
||
assert_eq!(body["role"], "license-issuer");
|
||
|
||
// List sees the new key but never the raw token.
|
||
let req = build_request("GET", "/v1/admin/api-keys", &[("authorization", &auth)], None);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let list = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let keys = list["api_keys"].as_array().expect("api_keys array");
|
||
assert_eq!(keys.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(keys[0]["label"], "Smoke test bot");
|
||
assert!(keys[0].get("token").is_none(), "list must not return raw tokens");
|
||
|
||
// Revoke. Idempotent on second call.
|
||
let path = format!("/v1/admin/api-keys/{}", key_id);
|
||
let req = build_request("DELETE", &path, &[("authorization", &auth)], None);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let req = build_request("DELETE", &path, &[("authorization", &auth)], None);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["already_revoked"], true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Create endpoint rejects unknown role with 400.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn scoped_api_key_create_rejects_unknown_role() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/api-keys",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"label": "bad role", "role": "god-mode"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::BAD_REQUEST);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// `POST /v1/admin/api-keys` requires master admin, NOT a scoped
|
||
/// full-admin key — generating other API keys is a self-elevation path
|
||
/// that scoped keys are deliberately denied.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn scoped_api_key_management_rejects_scoped_full_admin() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let master = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Master creates a full-admin scoped key.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/api-keys",
|
||
&[("authorization", &master)],
|
||
Some(json!({"label": "Tries to elevate", "role": "full-admin"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let scoped_token = body["token"].as_str().expect("token").to_string();
|
||
let scoped_auth = format!("Bearer {}", scoped_token);
|
||
|
||
// Scoped full-admin tries to create another key. Should 403 — the
|
||
// /v1/admin/api-keys handler calls require_admin, not require_scope.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/api-keys",
|
||
&[("authorization", &scoped_auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"label": "Pwn", "role": "read-only"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::FORBIDDEN,
|
||
"scoped keys (even full-admin) must NOT manage other keys"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Mint a scoped API key of `role` via the master-authed create endpoint and
|
||
/// return its raw bearer token. Exercises the real issue path the same way an
|
||
/// operator would.
|
||
async fn mint_scoped_key(state: &AppState, role: &str) -> String {
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/api-keys",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "label": format!("{role} key"), "role": role })),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK, "minting a {role} key should succeed");
|
||
body_json(resp)
|
||
.await
|
||
.get("token")
|
||
.and_then(|t| t.as_str())
|
||
.expect("create returns the raw token once")
|
||
.to_string()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Read-only scoped keys can hit read endpoints but are 403 on writes, and are
|
||
/// still denied the endpoints we deliberately keep master-only (db-info).
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn scoped_read_only_key_reads_but_cannot_write() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", mint_scoped_key(&state, "read-only").await);
|
||
|
||
// Read endpoint — allowed (every role grants `:read`). Use a param-free
|
||
// getter so the only gate exercised is the scope check (GET
|
||
// /v1/admin/licenses requires a product_id query param that 400s at the
|
||
// extractor before auth even runs).
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/admin/settings/operator-name",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(send(&state, req).await.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
// db-info stays master-only even for reads.
|
||
let req = build_request("GET", "/v1/admin/db-info", &[("authorization", &auth)], None);
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
send(&state, req).await.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::FORBIDDEN,
|
||
"db-info is master-only; a read-only scoped key must be denied"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Write endpoint — denied (products:write is full-admin only).
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "slug": "ro-denied", "name": "Nope", "price_sats": 1000 })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(send(&state, req).await.status(), StatusCode::FORBIDDEN);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// License-issuer scoped keys can issue licenses (licenses:write) but cannot
|
||
/// manage the catalog (products:write is full-admin only).
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn scoped_license_issuer_key_issues_but_cannot_manage_catalog() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let master = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Master seeds a product to issue against.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &master)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "slug": "issuer-prod", "name": "Issuer Prod", "price_sats": 1000 })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(send(&state, req).await.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", mint_scoped_key(&state, "license-issuer").await);
|
||
|
||
// Issue a license — allowed.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/licenses",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "product_slug": "issuer-prod" })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
send(&state, req).await.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"license-issuer must be able to issue licenses"
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Create a product — denied.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "slug": "issuer-cant", "name": "Nope", "price_sats": 1000 })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
send(&state, req).await.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::FORBIDDEN,
|
||
"license-issuer must NOT manage the catalog"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Support scoped keys are granted subscription/machine writes but not catalog
|
||
/// writes. The cancel of a nonexistent subscription is expected to fail
|
||
/// downstream (not found) — what matters is that authorization PASSED (not
|
||
/// 401/403), which isolates the scope grant from the business logic.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn scoped_support_key_allowed_support_writes_not_catalog() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", mint_scoped_key(&state, "support").await);
|
||
|
||
// subscriptions:write — auth passes; missing sub yields a non-403/401 status.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/subscriptions/does-not-exist/cancel",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let status = send(&state, req).await.status();
|
||
assert_ne!(status, StatusCode::FORBIDDEN, "support is granted subscriptions:write");
|
||
assert_ne!(status, StatusCode::UNAUTHORIZED);
|
||
|
||
// Catalog write — denied.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "slug": "sup-cant", "name": "Nope", "price_sats": 1000 })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(send(&state, req).await.status(), StatusCode::FORBIDDEN);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Full-admin scoped keys CAN manage the catalog (products:write). The
|
||
/// master-only denial (minting other keys, etc.) is covered by
|
||
/// `scoped_api_key_management_rejects_scoped_full_admin`.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn scoped_full_admin_key_manages_catalog() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", mint_scoped_key(&state, "full-admin").await);
|
||
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({ "slug": "fa-prod", "name": "FA Prod", "price_sats": 1000 })),
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
send(&state, req).await.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::OK,
|
||
"full-admin must be able to manage the catalog"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Zaprite Connect refuses on Creator-tier (no `zaprite_payments`
|
||
/// entitlement) with 402. Switching the daemon's self-tier to a
|
||
/// Pro-flavored Licensed tier lets the Connect-precheck pass (it then
|
||
/// fails downstream on the unreachable test host, but the tier gate is
|
||
/// behind us).
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn zaprite_connect_gated_by_pro_entitlement() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Creator tier (default for test fixture) — Connect should 402.
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/zaprite/connect",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({"api_key": "fake-zaprite-key"})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
resp.status(),
|
||
StatusCode::PAYMENT_REQUIRED,
|
||
"Zaprite Connect must 402 without zaprite_payments entitlement"
|
||
);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(body["error"], "tier_cap");
|
||
assert!(body["upgrade_url"].as_str().expect("upgrade_url").contains("/buy/keysat"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// CORS — the public read-only endpoints answer cross-origin requests
|
||
/// from any browser origin so docs.keysat.xyz can fetch live pricing
|
||
/// from licensing.keysat.xyz without proxying. `allow_credentials` is
|
||
/// intentionally OFF: pages can read public responses but cannot ride
|
||
/// a logged-in admin session cookie to hit /v1/admin/*.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn cors_allows_cross_origin_on_public_endpoints() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"GET",
|
||
"/v1/openapi.json",
|
||
&[("origin", "https://docs.keysat.xyz")],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let acao = resp
|
||
.headers()
|
||
.get("access-control-allow-origin")
|
||
.and_then(|v| v.to_str().ok())
|
||
.unwrap_or("");
|
||
assert_eq!(acao, "*", "public endpoints should set ACAO: *");
|
||
// Credentials must NOT be allowed — combining `*` origin with
|
||
// credentials is rejected by browsers, and disabling it means a
|
||
// hostile cross-origin page can't ride a session cookie.
|
||
let acac = resp.headers().get("access-control-allow-credentials");
|
||
assert!(acac.is_none(), "credentials must not be allowed");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// CORS preflight (OPTIONS) is handled by the CorsLayer directly and
|
||
/// never reaches the session-bridge or any handler. This is the path
|
||
/// browsers take before issuing an actual cross-origin POST.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn cors_preflight_returns_2xx_without_auth() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"OPTIONS",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[
|
||
("origin", "https://example.com"),
|
||
("access-control-request-method", "POST"),
|
||
("access-control-request-headers", "authorization,content-type"),
|
||
],
|
||
None,
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
// CorsLayer answers preflight with 200 (or 204). No auth required.
|
||
assert!(
|
||
resp.status().is_success() || resp.status() == StatusCode::NO_CONTENT,
|
||
"preflight should be 2xx, got {}",
|
||
resp.status()
|
||
);
|
||
let acao = resp
|
||
.headers()
|
||
.get("access-control-allow-origin")
|
||
.and_then(|v| v.to_str().ok())
|
||
.unwrap_or("");
|
||
assert_eq!(acao, "*");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Regression: `entitlements_catalog_json` was missing from every
|
||
/// product SELECT for ~a release, so admin UI edits appeared to drop
|
||
/// on the floor — the column was being written correctly but never
|
||
/// read back. This test creates a product, sets a catalog, reads it
|
||
/// back through the same code path the admin UI hits.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn product_entitlements_catalog_round_trips_through_list_endpoint() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let auth = format!("Bearer {}", TEST_ADMIN_KEY);
|
||
|
||
// Create a product
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"POST",
|
||
"/v1/admin/products",
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"slug": "catalog-rt",
|
||
"name": "Catalog round-trip",
|
||
"description": "",
|
||
"price_currency": "SAT",
|
||
"price_value": 1000,
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK, "product create");
|
||
let created = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let product_id = created["id"].as_str().expect("id").to_string();
|
||
|
||
// PATCH the catalog
|
||
let req = build_request(
|
||
"PATCH",
|
||
&format!("/v1/admin/products/{}", product_id),
|
||
&[("authorization", &auth)],
|
||
Some(json!({
|
||
"entitlements_catalog": [
|
||
{"slug": "self_host", "name": "Self-host on Start9", "description": "Run on your own hardware."},
|
||
{"slug": "unlimited_products", "name": "Unlimited products", "description": "No 5-product cap."}
|
||
]
|
||
})),
|
||
);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK, "product patch with catalog");
|
||
|
||
// Now read it back via /v1/products (same endpoint the admin UI uses)
|
||
let req = build_request("GET", "/v1/products", &[], None);
|
||
let resp = send(&state, req).await;
|
||
assert_eq!(resp.status(), StatusCode::OK);
|
||
let body = body_json(resp).await;
|
||
let products = body["products"].as_array().expect("products array");
|
||
let found = products
|
||
.iter()
|
||
.find(|p| p["id"] == product_id)
|
||
.expect("product visible in list");
|
||
let catalog = found["entitlements_catalog"]
|
||
.as_array()
|
||
.expect("entitlements_catalog should be an array, not null");
|
||
assert_eq!(catalog.len(), 2, "both catalog entries should round-trip");
|
||
assert_eq!(catalog[0]["slug"], "self_host");
|
||
assert_eq!(catalog[1]["slug"], "unlimited_products");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Audit coverage for the `:52` merchant-profile / payment-provider model.
|
||
/// These queries are runtime-prepared (`sqlx::query(&format!(...))`), so column
|
||
/// errors only surface when executed — and the resolution path had no passing
|
||
/// test, which let an ambiguous-column bug ship in `get_merchant_profile_for_product`.
|
||
/// This drives the write + preference + resolution queries end to end so the
|
||
/// whole `:52` SQL surface is exercised by at least one green test.
|
||
#[tokio::test]
|
||
async fn merchant_profile_provider_resolution_queries_round_trip() {
|
||
let (state, _tmp) = make_test_state().await;
|
||
let now = "2026-06-12T00:00:00Z";
|
||
|
||
// Default profile is created by migration 0020.
|
||
let default = repo::get_default_merchant_profile(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("get_default_merchant_profile")
|
||
.expect("a default profile exists post-migration");
|
||
|
||
// Profile CRUD reads/writes.
|
||
let p2 = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
repo::create_merchant_profile(
|
||
&state.db, &p2, "Recaps", None, None, None, None, None, false, now,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_merchant_profile");
|
||
repo::get_merchant_profile_by_id(&state.db, &p2)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("get_merchant_profile_by_id")
|
||
.expect("created profile exists");
|
||
assert!(
|
||
repo::list_merchant_profiles(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("list_merchant_profiles")
|
||
.len()
|
||
>= 2
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// Attach a BTCPay provider to the default profile (store_id present so
|
||
// build_provider can construct a client without a network call).
|
||
let prov = Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||
repo::create_payment_provider(
|
||
&state.db, &prov, &default.id, "btcpay", "Test BTCPay",
|
||
"api-key", "http://btcpay.test", Some("wh-1"), Some("secret"), Some("store-1"), now,
|
||
)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("create_payment_provider");
|
||
repo::get_payment_provider_by_id(&state.db, &prov)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("get_payment_provider_by_id")
|
||
.expect("created provider exists");
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
repo::list_payment_providers_for_profile(&state.db, &default.id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("list_payment_providers_for_profile")
|
||
.len(),
|
||
1
|
||
);
|
||
repo::list_all_payment_providers(&state.db)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("list_all_payment_providers");
|
||
|
||
// Rail preference write + read.
|
||
repo::set_rail_preference(&state.db, &default.id, "lightning", &prov)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("set_rail_preference");
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
repo::list_rail_preferences_for_profile(&state.db, &default.id)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("list_rail_preferences_for_profile")
|
||
.len(),
|
||
1
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
// The production purchase path's resolution, both branches:
|
||
// - Lightning resolves via the explicit preference just set.
|
||
// - OnChain has no preference but BTCPay serves it → served-rail fallback.
|
||
let (row_pref, _p) = state
|
||
.resolve_provider_for_profile_rail(&default.id, keysat::payment::Rail::Lightning)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("resolve lightning via explicit preference");
|
||
assert_eq!(row_pref.id, prov);
|
||
let (row_fallback, _p) = state
|
||
.resolve_provider_for_profile_rail(&default.id, keysat::payment::Rail::Onchain)
|
||
.await
|
||
.expect("resolve onchain via served-rail fallback");
|
||
assert_eq!(row_fallback.id, prov);
|
||
}
|
||
|