8ce78ab9d3
First step of TIER_UPGRADES_DESIGN.md (Grant + me, parent folder).
Schema-only commit; Phases 2-6 (quote logic, buyer endpoints, admin
endpoints, admin UI, buyer surface) ship in follow-ups.
Migration 0013_tier_upgrades.sql:
1. ALTER TABLE policies ADD COLUMN tier_rank INTEGER. Operator-defined
ladder ordering — higher = better tier. NULL means the policy isn't
in any ladder (existing operators see no behavior change). The
buyer-facing upgrade endpoint will validate
target.tier_rank > current.tier_rank for upgrades, and the reverse
for downgrades. Index on (product_id, tier_rank) supports the
"list this product's policies in ladder order" query.
2. New tier_changes table — one row per upgrade/downgrade. Captures:
- from_policy_id / to_policy_id with FKs into policies
- direction ('upgrade' | 'downgrade', CHECK enforced)
- listed_currency + proration_charge_value (smallest unit) for the
pricing snapshot; invoice_id nullable so comp-mode admin changes
(skip_payment=true) can write a row without an invoice
- effective_at decoupled from created_at so downgrades on recurring
subs can be RECORDED immediately but TAKE EFFECT at cycle end
- actor ('buyer' | 'admin', CHECK enforced) + free-form reason
- Three indexes covering the obvious query paths: by license
(history view), by created_at (operator analytics), partial on
invoice_id WHERE NOT NULL (webhook-handler lookup of
"is this settling invoice a tier-change?").
Migration regression test (8 tests now in tests/migrations.rs, was 7):
- Existing pre-0013 fixtures untouched, tier_rank defaults to NULL.
- tier_changes accepts a row referencing pre-0013 license/policy/invoice.
- CHECK constraints fire: bad direction, bad actor, negative
proration_charge_value all rejected.
- assert_db_clean confirms no FK / integrity drift.
Drive-by: branding design doc (parent folder) bumps its migration
number from 0013 → 0014 to avoid a collision with this one.
Test count: 58 (was 57; +1 for migration_0013_adds_tier_upgrades).
120 lines
5.9 KiB
SQL
120 lines
5.9 KiB
SQL
-- Tier upgrades: schema foundation.
|
|
--
|
|
-- This migration adds the storage shape needed for in-place tier
|
|
-- upgrades + downgrades on existing licenses (Standard → Pro,
|
|
-- Trial → Standard, etc.). Daemon code that USES these columns +
|
|
-- table lands in subsequent commits per TIER_UPGRADES_DESIGN.md
|
|
-- Phases 2-6.
|
|
--
|
|
-- Strategy: additive only. Existing licenses + policies are
|
|
-- untouched. A policy becomes "part of the tier ladder" by getting
|
|
-- a `tier_rank` value; policies with NULL tier_rank are excluded
|
|
-- from buyer-facing upgrade flows (admin can still force-change
|
|
-- to/from any policy). This means existing operators who don't
|
|
-- want tier upgrades can ignore the feature entirely — none of
|
|
-- their policies are in any ladder until they opt in by setting
|
|
-- a rank.
|
|
|
|
PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON;
|
|
|
|
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
-- policies: tier_rank for ladder ordering
|
|
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
-- Operator-defined ordering. Higher rank = better tier. A product
|
|
-- can have policies "free" (rank 0), "standard" (rank 1), "pro"
|
|
-- (rank 2), "patron" (rank 3). The tier-upgrade endpoint validates
|
|
-- that target.tier_rank > current.tier_rank for upgrades, and the
|
|
-- reverse for downgrades. NULL = excluded from the buyer-facing
|
|
-- ladder (e.g. limited-edition promo policy that shouldn't appear
|
|
-- as an upgrade target).
|
|
--
|
|
-- We don't enforce uniqueness within a product — operators can
|
|
-- legitimately have two policies at the same rank (e.g. "Pro
|
|
-- Monthly" and "Pro Annual" both at rank=2 — same entitlements,
|
|
-- different cadence). Sideways changes between same-rank policies
|
|
-- are admin-only; the buyer endpoint rejects them.
|
|
ALTER TABLE policies ADD COLUMN tier_rank INTEGER;
|
|
|
|
-- Index supports the common "list this product's policies in
|
|
-- ladder order" query used by both the admin tier-rank picker and
|
|
-- the buyer-side tier listing.
|
|
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_policies_tier_rank
|
|
ON policies(product_id, tier_rank);
|
|
|
|
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
-- tier_changes: audit trail of every tier change ever applied
|
|
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
-- One row per upgrade or downgrade. The `licenses.policy_id` column
|
|
-- still holds the CURRENT tier; this table is the history. Operators
|
|
-- can answer "what tier was this license on as of date X" by walking
|
|
-- tier_changes ordered by created_at; combined with
|
|
-- effective_at, "is the license currently entitled to <X>" is also a
|
|
-- cheap lookup against licenses.policy_id alone (no walk needed).
|
|
--
|
|
-- effective_at is decoupled from created_at for downgrades on
|
|
-- recurring subs: the downgrade is RECORDED immediately (created_at)
|
|
-- but doesn't TAKE EFFECT until the end of the current cycle
|
|
-- (effective_at = cycle_end). For upgrades, effective_at usually
|
|
-- equals created_at (immediate on payment settle).
|
|
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS tier_changes (
|
|
id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, -- UUID v4
|
|
license_id TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
from_policy_id TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
to_policy_id TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
direction TEXT NOT NULL, -- 'upgrade' | 'downgrade'
|
|
|
|
-- Pricing snapshot. The proration math (and the rate fetcher
|
|
-- for fiat conversions) runs at quote time and is frozen here
|
|
-- once the change is applied. For comp-mode admin changes
|
|
-- (skip_payment=true), proration_charge_value is 0 and
|
|
-- invoice_id is NULL.
|
|
listed_currency TEXT NOT NULL, -- 'SAT' | 'USD' | 'EUR'
|
|
proration_charge_value INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, -- smallest unit of listed_currency
|
|
invoice_id TEXT, -- nullable: 0-charge changes have no invoice
|
|
|
|
-- When the new entitlements take effect. For upgrades on
|
|
-- recurring subs OR perpetual: typically same as created_at.
|
|
-- For downgrades on recurring subs: end of current cycle.
|
|
effective_at TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
|
|
-- Audit. 'buyer' = self-service via /v1/upgrade.
|
|
-- 'admin' = operator action via /v1/admin/licenses/:id/change-tier.
|
|
actor TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
-- Optional free-form note. Audit-only; not user-visible. The
|
|
-- admin endpoint accepts a `reason` field that lands here.
|
|
reason TEXT,
|
|
|
|
created_at TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
|
|
FOREIGN KEY (license_id) REFERENCES licenses(id),
|
|
FOREIGN KEY (from_policy_id) REFERENCES policies(id),
|
|
FOREIGN KEY (to_policy_id) REFERENCES policies(id),
|
|
FOREIGN KEY (invoice_id) REFERENCES invoices(id),
|
|
CHECK (direction IN ('upgrade', 'downgrade')),
|
|
CHECK (actor IN ('buyer', 'admin')),
|
|
CHECK (proration_charge_value >= 0)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
-- Admin-UI "show me this license's tier history" query path.
|
|
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_tier_changes_license
|
|
ON tier_changes(license_id, created_at);
|
|
-- Operator analytics: "how many upgrades happened this month?"
|
|
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_tier_changes_created
|
|
ON tier_changes(created_at);
|
|
-- Webhook-handler lookup: an invoice settles, we need to know
|
|
-- whether it's a tier-change invoice (vs a fresh purchase or a
|
|
-- subscription renewal).
|
|
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_tier_changes_invoice
|
|
ON tier_changes(invoice_id) WHERE invoice_id IS NOT NULL;
|
|
|
|
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
-- Note: no CHECK constraint enforcing that tier_rank is set on
|
|
-- policies that participate in upgrade flows. The check lives in
|
|
-- the API handler (api/upgrade.rs, future commit) because:
|
|
-- 1. SQLite ALTER TABLE doesn't support adding CHECKs.
|
|
-- 2. NULL tier_rank is a valid state for "this policy isn't in
|
|
-- any ladder" — there's nothing to enforce at the row level.
|
|
-- 3. The semantic check ("you can't upgrade to a policy with
|
|
-- NULL tier_rank") is a cross-row invariant the API layer
|
|
-- handles cleanly with a single SELECT.
|